GENERAL42430 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

accurate. This should be clarified by the surveyor; perhaps there is another map sheet that is the actual survey? Please let me know. The survey map was to include location of the structures on the site. I did not s e those identified on the map. (See conditions #ti. B. also which deals with building pe it requirements.) ,vs you nave st Approval states: The survey map shall include property boundaries and corners, roads, occur boundaries and identification of extraction, reclamation, storage/loading areas and ocation of structures. The survey shall also show and label the grid as proposed in the app ication and indicate where grid corners have been surveyed and marked in the field. Co ers of the property shall be marked as specified in the application, with metal or cedar pos s painted al the top eighteen inches with day-glow orange. Corner posts shall r 'n in place throughout the life of the operation and shall be replaced as needed due to ge or other loss. The maps provided contain all of these features at a minimum. Operations) are in full compliance with Part 4 of the Special Review. The surveyor is representing tote accuracy of the boundaries and locations as shown. The surveyor placed a previous boundary survey over an ortho-rectified ima a such that political and visual features could be measured directly from the aerial image. The metes and bounds are shown on the quarry boundazy, as portrayed on the maps pro ided. Curt Acklam, Acklam Associates, Inc., has remazked that to perform another boon ary survey would not alter any of the information already portrayed on the maps as provi ed. Upon request, we will provide a clarifying letter to this effect from Curt Acklam. The methods and purposes for combining aerial and survey based info ation were extensively detailed in the Special Review and DMG 112 permit submittal and subsequent Technical Revision. In your concluding comments, you remazk, "It is most hel ful to have the aerial photo as a background to the mining plan maps." While we agree, a comment evokes concern that as yet the practical purposes of the aerial information wh n corrected and correlated to survey information is not fully understood or appreciated by P arming. The aerial photographs were never intended as an appendage to this Special Re iew or any corresponding State or Federal permit. They are absolutely fundamental the key mapping and measttring tool for irregular boundaries, the tracking and reportin of existing and planned extraction and reclamation activities, and the verification of total cted land. The changes identified in the DMG Technical Revision were forecast in both Ih DMG 112 Permit application provided with the approved Special Review. The refine ents in the DMG Technical Revision are central to both. Mark corners o,[pronertx. Corners of the property need to be marked as spe ified, with metal or cedar posts painted at the top 18" with day-glow orange paint. Thi may have already been completed as part of the property survey, but please indicate whet er this has been completed. 2 Tuesday 17 November 1998 Correspondence in the matter of Special Review File 97-ZR09~, Rocky Road Quarry, to Carol Evans, Lorimer County Planning Department, from Douglas J. Bac li, Vice- President, Rocky Road Investment, Inc.