My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL42418
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL42418
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:11:01 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 11:46:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/15/1995
Doc Name
FAX COVER PROVISION OF INFORMATION UPDATING THE ESITMATION OF LEAKAGE RATES
From
CRIPPLE CREEK & VICTOR GOLD MINING CO
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Golder Assxlafes Ina //''t~ ~~ <br />200 Union Boulevard. Suite 500 AW^^Aid~t'^Y~ <br />Lakewood. CO USA 80228 ~ ~ 1'~~`S <br />Telephone(3031980~0540 <br />Fax (303)985-2080 <br />May 24, 1995 Project No.:943-2847 <br />Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company <br />2755 State Highway 67 <br />Victor, CO 80860 <br />Attention: Mr. John Hardaway <br />RE: REVIEW OF THE LOW VOLUME SOLUTION COLLECTION SYSTEM ACTION <br />LEAKAGE LIMIT RATES <br />Dear John: <br />Golder Associates Inc. (Golder) has evaluated the Low Volume Solution Collection System (LVSCS) <br />Action Leakage Rates (ALR's) for the Phase i Heap Leach Pad. <br />BACKGROUND <br />A liner leakage evaluation was conducted for the Phase 1 Pregnant Pond to evaluate the theoretical flow <br />rates expected during normal operating conditions. Leakage rates were calculated using methods proposed <br />by Gtroud & Bonaparte (1989) and Van Zyl (1990), for the evaluation of leakage through a single hole in a <br />liner. The basic premise for all liner leakage results presented herein are that, even if careful construction <br />and quality assurance are maintained during liner installation, one hole per acre could still be present in the <br />geosynthetic liner system at a well conswcced mining installation (Van Zyl, 1990). <br />For modeling purposes, the geomembrane was assumed to be located between two infinitely permeable <br />media. Giroud & Bonaparte (1989) used Bernoulli's equation for free flow through an orifice to calculate <br />the flow through the primary liner as follows: Q = Cn A 2gh <br />Equation [ I ] <br />where: <br />Q = Flow rate through hole (m'/s) <br />Cb = Numeric Coefficient (0.6) <br />A = Area of hole (m'-) <br />g = Acceleration due to gravity (m/s'') <br />h = Depth of fluid (m) <br />Based on the above equation, leakage through the liner is controlled by the following parameters: <br />• Characteristics of the underlying material; <br />• Depth of Fluid or hydraulic head; and, <br />• Number and area of defects. <br />The underlying material was assumed to be infinitely permeable. A Low Volume Solution Collection <br />System (LVSCS) is present so that any solution collected above the composite liner system would be <br />pumped out and the head on the composite liner system would be minimized. <br />In developing the EPA background document on liner leakage for solid waste facilities. Bonaparte et. al. <br />(1987) recommended that a defect with a diameter of 2 mm be appropriate for estimating ALR's as a result <br />of flow into the leakage collection layer under typical operating conditions. <br />OFFICES IN AUSTRALIA, CANADA. GERMANY, HUNGAIN. ITALY, SWEDEN. UNITED KINGDOM. UNITED STATES <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.