Laserfiche WebLink
February 2000 Summary Page S-13 <br />Mining operations on both coal leases could result in increased discharges to the North Fork of the <br />Gunnison River. However, since all discharges must meet federal and Colorado Department of Public <br />Health and Environment regulations, no adverse affects on aquatic species are anticipated due to the <br />quality of discharged water. <br />The use and transport of fuels to the exploration sites and mining operations would represent a risk to <br />aquatic species and their habitat, if a spill or accident occurred. By implementing a mitigation measure <br />that would restrict any fueling of vehicles or equipment near streams, water bodies and their <br />associated biological communities would be protected. The risk of a fuel spill or Teak reaching the <br />North Fork of the Gunnison River, Hubbard Creek, or Terror Creek during transport is considered <br />extremely low, based on the expected low frequency of such traffic. <br />S-3.11 Cultural Resources <br />Existing Conditions -Cultural resource surveys within and surrounding the coal lease tracts and <br />exploration license area revealed 17 sites. These sites have been recorded with the State Historic <br />Preservation Office. Most of these sites are located near the extreme western periphery of the area, <br />generally along the east side of the Terror Creek drainage. This distribution apparently reflects <br />previous survey activity in this area, and is not necessarily indicative of a similar cultural resource <br />distributional pattern within the unsurveyed portions of the area. The sites previously recorded consist <br />of eight isolated prehistoric lithic artifacts, three prehistoric open camp sites, two historic corrals, one <br />historic dugout, one historic dump site, one historic cabin, and one non-cultural rock overhang recorded <br />as a "possible" prehistoric rockshelter. <br />Historic mining has occurred within and adjacent to the coal lease tracts and exploration license area. <br />The historic King Mine site and the associated Bowie town site, have extensive histories dating from <br />the turn of the century era. Both the King Mine and the Bowie town site have been officially <br />determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. Both of these sites, however, are <br />outside of the coal lease tracts and exploration license area. <br />Environmental Consequences -Cultural site density is low, and no impacts to cultural resources are <br />anticipated. Subsidence as a result of longwall mining should not cause any discernable impacts to <br />cultural resources on the site. Recordation and evaluation of the Dove Cave site is required if it is <br />subject to any future surface impacts including potential subsidence. <br />S-3.12 Noise <br />Existing Conditions -Background noise level measurements at representative locations around the <br />project site were taken on April 21 and April 23, 1999. Rural background measurements were taken <br />during the daytime and nighttime at two locations on Garvin Mesa and atone location next to State <br />Highway 133. Daytime and nighttime background noise readings were also taken at several locations <br />in Paonia and Hotchkiss. Some of the monitoring stations at Paonia and Hotchkiss were later used to <br />measure noise levels caused by passing coal trains. <br />In general, the background noise measurements taken at night on Garvin Mesa were 36 dBA, with the <br />predominant noises being natural bird sounds. Routine daytime noise levels in the urban residential <br />areas were 48 to 56 dBA, with the predominant sounds produced by routine local traffic. At the rural <br />site near Slate Highway 133, the spot check measurements showed 41 to 49 dBA during brief periods <br />of no discernable traffic and spot noise levels of 64 dBA during the brief period while a coal truck drove <br />past. <br />Environmental Consequences -Noise has historically been recognized as a health hazard with the <br />potential for causing hearing damage. Efforts by industry and regulatory actions have lessened the <br />Final Environmental Impact Statement <br />