My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL42119
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL42119
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:10:40 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 11:36:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
5/10/2001
Doc Name
FEDERAL COAL LEASE COC-61209 APRIL 2001 MODIFICATION
Permit Index Doc Type
Other Permits
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 5-10 Summary February 2000 <br />• Pinon/Juniper <br />Douglas fir <br />Cottonwood <br />Spruce/fir <br />Grass/fort <br />Bare <br />A number of noxious weed species are known to be of concern in Delta and Gunnison counties. These <br />species include Russian knapweed, hoary cress, yellow toadflax, Canada thistle, musk thistle, and <br />scotch thistle. <br />No federally listed threatened or endangered plant species are known to exist on either coal lease tract <br />or the exploration license area. A "forest-sensitive" species, Hapman's coolwort, could be present in <br />the Hubbard Falls area. <br />Environmental Consequences -The construction of various borehole, shaft, and access road <br />facilities would directly affect a maximum of approximately 33.5 acres of vegetation. The primary <br />vegetation communities to be affected include the oak and aspen vegetation types. The resulting loss <br />of any timber or grazing resources would be minimal, with the potential for a slight long-term increase <br />in grazing potential possible following revegetation activities. It is unlikely that any measurable impact <br />to vegetation would occur as a result of mine subsidence. <br />S-3.8 Wetlands <br />• Existing Conditions - No formal delineations of wetlands or other Waters of the U.S. were completed <br />on either the coal lease tracts or the exploration license area. Seep and spring information was <br />compiled for the coal lease tracts and the exploration area. <br />Wetland and riparian plant communities, other than those associated with seeps, springs, and <br />stockponds, are typically confined to the borders of creeks and drainage channels. Wetland hydrology <br />is provided primarily by channel flooding and lateral flow. Wetland/upland transition zones are typically <br />narrow to abrupt as a function of channel topography. Wetland vegetation communities are <br />comparatively simplistic in terms of diversity, typically being dominated by a few hydric species. The <br />tree stratum, where it occurs, is dominated by narrow-leaf cottonwood and boxelder at lower <br />elevations. Aspen is the common tree of wetlands occurring at higher elevations. Dominant wetland <br />shrubs inGude a variety of species such as coyote willow and plane-leaf willow, thinleaf alder, and red- <br />osierdogwood. <br />Springs and seeps in the region typically support willows along with a variety of grasses and forts. <br />Springs and seeps on nearly level to moderate terrain, particularly at higher elevations, support <br />herbaceous communities characterized by species such as California false-hellebore, streamside <br />bluebells, and various sedges. Stockponds are man-made features which are filled either by springs or <br />from overland runoff. Wetlands occurring in assoaation with developed stockponds are typically <br />limited to a narrow bank fringe- dominated primarily by spikerush and rush species. Other species <br />such as small-winged sedge, clustered field sedge, northwest cinquefoil, and a variety of butter-cups <br />may also be present. <br />Environmental Consequences - Impacts, which would vary by action alternative, are directly <br />• associated with potential subsidence and possible dewa.tering in Hubbard and Terror creeks. <br />With dewatering of the D coal seam during operations, some wetlands along Hubbard Creek could be <br />affected. Depending upon the size of the reduction, the wetland/riparian area boundary zones might <br />shrink along the margins of Hubbard Creek. Dominant wetland herbaceous species inhabiting this <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.