My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL42099
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL42099
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:10:39 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 11:35:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1983194
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Name
COVER SHEET 4 APPENDICES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4.2 APPENDIX B <br />and potential loss of borehole are to be avoided. WRC <br />will use LC materials in the mud when drilling through <br />and beyond the Leached Zone. This type of mud in the <br />hole, if not removed, is not conducive to efficient <br />displacement of mud by the cement. <br />Failure to adequately remove the mud in the hole during <br />the cementing operations may result in cement channeling <br />and subsequent fluid migration, elevated pumping pressures, <br />reduction in cement bonding capability, and total job faflure. <br />Prior to cementing, a reduction in fluid loss, viscosity, yield <br />point, and gel strength of the mud will increase the <br />displacement efficiency. <br />Much haz been written regarding proper cementing Dow <br />regimes. Most authors agree that turbulent Dow provides <br />the highest displacement efficiencies, but with most cements, <br />turbulent Oow cannot be achieved. Plug flow was once <br />thought to be nearly az effective az turbulent flow. However, <br />the curtent trend in industry seems to indicate that the greatest <br />possible permissible velocity, given surface equipment and <br />downhole wostraints, should be used. Laminar flow results <br />in the lowest displacement efficiencies. <br />Wazbes, flushes, and spacers also promote displacement <br />efficiency by thinning the mud ahead, preventing a cemen[- <br />mud interface that facilitates channeling and cement <br />contamination, removing pockets (washouts) of thick, <br />viscous gel and the fdm of mud on the casing. Turbulent <br />flow is obtained more easily with these fluids than with <br />the cement slurry. <br />Although not much has been written about contact time <br />(the time cement Flows past a certain point in the well bore), <br />many authors feel that adequate zonal isolation cannot occur <br />without a "minimum" contact time. The greater the contact <br />time, the greater the chances are in displacing all drilling <br />mud from a point in the well bore and achieving a good <br />cement job. A 10-minute contact time is recommended. <br />Improved displacement efficiency can be realized when <br />pipe movement is conducted. Pipe movement is accomp- <br />lished by reciprocating or rotating the pipe. tE the casing <br />is adequately centralized, hole conditions (i.e., gauge and <br />deviation) and mud properties are good, reciprocation is <br />the better choice of the two. Rotation adds more of a lateral <br />motion component to the system that facilitates mud rernoval <br />from the narrow side of the annulus but also induces <br />additional stresses on the pipe. <br />When scratchers or wipers are installed on the using <br />across the cementing interval and pipe motion is used, <br />displacement efficiency improves. The greatest benefit occurs <br />io regions of hole washout. Scratchers help in breaking the <br />gelled mud within washouts and increases the amount of <br />cement Flow into washouts. With a properly treated cement, <br />removal of the mud cake during cement circulation vastly <br />improves the cement to formation bond. However, caution <br />must be exercised to avoid flash setting or dehydration of <br />the cement. A low fluid loss cement will eliminate this <br />problem. Removal of the mud cake, in the presence of mud, <br />adds little benefit since the mud cake will be quickly replaced. <br />Dislodged mud cake must be removed prior to cement <br />circulation if contamination is to be avoided. <br />The shoe of the 836-inch casing will be set approximately <br />30 feet into the Saline Zane with [he cement top extending <br />across the dissolution surface and into the Leached Zone. <br />Rock quality data (RQD) obtained from W RC for [he leased <br />area indicates that the lower half of the 100-foot cementing <br />interval is fractured and rubblized but maintain an RQD <br />of 60 percent (Note: All RQD percentages presented are <br />approximate with a simple average given for specific <br />intervals). Portions of the remaining 100 feet are composed <br />of nahcclite, nahcolitic halite, and nahcolitic oil shale subject <br />to dissolution by the drilling fluid, casing pack, and cement. <br />The RQD for this interval is 10 percent. Hole enlargements <br />will occur across this interval making mud removal difficult. <br />The leached zone above the 100-foot cement top exhibits <br />low RQD percentages; however, these percentages increase <br />to 30 percent over an interval from I(b feet to 200 feet <br />above the shoe of the 8 3§-inch casing. Additional cement <br />bonding may occur through this interval. <br />An anticipated oceurtence az a result of forming solution <br />mined gvities is the collapse of cavity roofs. Caving of <br />the overlying strata into the cavity would extend vertically <br />until the cavity was bulked full. The predicted height of <br />the caving is 53 feet which would extend through the <br />dissolution surface into the leached zone. Since the bottom <br />50 feet of the 100-toot cementing interval presents the <br />greatest opportunity far cement bonding, isolation of the <br />cavity would be severely jeopardized if caving was to occur. <br />Subsequent horizontal drilling will occur that will further <br />jeopardize what little integrity, if any, the I00 foot annular <br />column of cement exhibits. Many surface casing shoes in <br />oil and gas wells have been "wobbled off' for lack of <br />adequate cementjobs. <br />Operational parameters dictate the presence of mining <br />solution within the 835-inch casing. Air compressed to <br />approximately 800 pounds per square inch gunge (psig) will <br />be exerted on the 544-inch by 8 i4-inch casing annulus <br />to prevent mining solution from occupying the interior of <br />the 8 ye-inch casing. The pressure will be monitored for <br />possible 8 i4-inch casing leaks. If the pressure falls to 700 <br />prig, casing failure may have oceurted. A pressure drop <br />of 100 prig equates to a Fluid rise in the 8 i6-inch casing <br />of approximately 300 feet. If a casing leak were to occur <br />above the 100-foot column of cement and did not invoke <br />a pressure drop greater than 100 psig, mining solution would <br />enter the annulus and may contaminate uphole resources. <br />4.2-2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.