Laserfiche WebLink
Planning commison notes. <br />Somerset coal <br />by Laura Anderson <br />The coal industry is in goo <br />shape if the mines in Gunniso <br />County are any indication. Oiler <br />tors of two coal mines in Somers <br />came before the Gunnison Count <br />Planning Commission Friday see <br />ing to expand. Their proposals wi <br />also be considered by the Divisio <br />of Minerals and Geology. <br />First was Basil bear, one of t <br />owners of the Bear Coal Compan <br />While not the biggest operation i <br />the North Fork Valley, the Bear C <br />Company is the longest-runnin <br />mine. Begun in 1935, the fourth ge <br />erasion of the Bears now works <br />the mine -and the Bfth generation <br />on its way. <br />companies seeking to :expand 999 <br />The Bear Coal Company re- <br />moves about 900,000 tons of coal <br />d each year from the mountajns that <br />n surround Somerset and employs 49 <br />a_ people. In contrast,'the West Elk. <br />et Coal Company, a division of Arco, <br />y takes three million tons of coal per <br />k_ year from the Somerset area. Coal is <br />Il transported from the North Fork <br />n Valley via train -and there is <br />enough to fill more than 400 trains <br />he per year. While some of the coal <br />y. ends up in Utah, the bulk of it goes <br />n east. Gunnison County contributes <br />oat to the one billion tons of coal that the <br />g United States bums per year, eighty <br />n- percent of which produces electric- <br />al itS'. . ' <br />is As mine consultant Jim Stover <br />told the planning commission, the <br />Bear Coal Company has mined most <br />of the coal from its current permit <br />area. While surface facilities are on <br />-about eight acres of private ground, <br />the coal is actually taken from fed- <br />eral land south of Somerset. The <br />current seam is 1500 (eel below the <br />surface. <br />Stover explained that the com- <br />pany wants to expand its permit <br />area to remove coal under two addi- <br />tional 40-acre parcels. There are no <br />Tenewable-reswres, springs-or <br />water above the requested land. <br />There could be subsidence once the <br />coal is taken out but Stover said that <br />would not be a problem since the <br />land above the mine is "a huge steep <br />mountain." The company estimates <br />that it would take four years to mine <br />all of this new coal. <br />"It's not very often you can <br />bring additional coal reserves out <br />without additional surface land dis- <br />turbance," planning commission <br />member Ken Spann commented. <br />"The only possible surface change is <br />the length of time coal is hauled <br />through Somerset. Does that merit a <br />public hearing?" <br />"Because the hauling was once <br />an issue of contention... 1 think we <br />ought to have a public hearing;' <br />planning commission member Don <br />Crosby responded. <br />The planning commission de- <br />tided to set the. matter for public <br />hearing in February. <br />lncrease4 production sou¢ht - - <br />Another North Fork Valley <br />company will be'subject to a'publit <br />hearing on'~~the'~same'~day:, Walt <br />Wright, manager~of the•Soinerset <br />Mining Company, approached the <br />Gunnison County Planning Com- <br />mission~with~a request lo'ihcrease <br />coal production. ~ "''"' <br />• While the permit for his opera- <br />tion'estimates 750,000 tons~of coal <br />will be~mined each~year,~the'com- <br />panyactually took out 850,000 tons <br />in ]993. It is doing so well that it <br />wants~to purchase new equipment <br />and increase production to9.3'mil- <br />lion tons annually. It would also like <br />the permit to allow it to employ up <br />to 750 people. At present the com- <br />panyhasastaffof92. ~ ~''"~'~ <br />"The impact would~be a few <br />more employees and one more train <br />per week," Jim Stover, also aconsul- <br />tant for the Somerset Mining <br />Company, said. <br />Riverland Industrial Park dis• <br />SY;e4t~ <br />The Gunnison County Planning <br />Commission Friday discussed the <br />sketch plan of (fling two of the <br />Riverland-1r;duslrial Park south of <br />Crested Butte. The developers hope <br />to see a combination of industrial <br />and residential buildings on the <br />property. <br />As proposed, the second and <br />(final phase of Riverland Industrial <br />Park contains 23 lots on 94.73 acres <br />of land. The plan is for about 20 <br />acres, primarily wetlands, drainage <br />and the Slate River, to remain open <br />space deeded to the home owners. <br />~~• Hearing:that~~thei lots~•would <br />contain individual septic systems, <br />the planning commission members <br />raised concerns about what types of <br />waste might be discharged from in- <br />dustrial operations as well as what <br />the cumulative effect of that many <br />septic systems might be. They asked <br />about access onto Highway ]35 and <br />discussed combining residential and <br />industrial uses. They will continue <br />discussion at another work session <br />next month. <br />Silver Sage sketch Plan aDRrov d <br />The Planning Commission ap- <br />proved the sketch plan For the Silver <br />. Sage Subdivision after adding a <br />number of conditions to it, includ- <br />ingsomethat deal with water rights. <br />The proposed development, which <br />would contain 23 single-family <br />homes justpouth of Crested Butte, <br />now goes before the Gunnison <br />County Commissioner, who will <br />hold a public hearing on it. <br />