|
' Xk n.
<br />Ar all lim¢5 relevan( hereto, Il,e Delentlanl's agents, servants, empl¢y-
<br />ees, represenlalives, and officers were adirg wiltrin the course aM scope of
<br />Illelr employment for the Delerldanl, C F. 8 I., and Ihus, fhe Plainli(t invokes fhe
<br />doddne of tesoordeat suoedor tar purposes of this suit
<br />' ~ DAMAGES
<br />XXgI.
<br />As a Bred end proximate result of the Defendanfs condud, the deledive:..,
<br />condition of each Delerldanl's produd, erd the oecurrerrce described herein,
<br />. ~ ~ the PIa1nIIN,~fraq Clamon has Irlwrred, or In reasonable probablfity will Inver, -
<br />the logowing elements of damages:
<br />a, past. physkxl polo and mental anguish; . .. .. . . . . ....
<br />~: b, . physical pain and mental anguish which wip, in reasonable probabil- .; . ~:- . -
<br />Ity, be sustained In the lulure: ~ -.. ~ . ..... .. -
<br />' a pall loss.ol earNrgsaM eamfng capadty; _ '--
<br />.. . d. ~ loss~oi eaMngs end eaming capadty.gll(dr wig, In reasonable plph-:.- _:» ,.- . , ~'. '
<br />ability, be sustained In the INure; • - ... ~ ... _ .,... .. .
<br />.. e;.past disfigurement: ~ ,r r-.
<br />" . :~.~~ 1: ~dsfigutemenl which will, In reasonable probablGly, be sustained In Ihe~~;;,,~..•~. >~~.;~
<br />lulure; .. .. - , . .. -
<br />9~ pall physipl impairment; .
<br />h. physipl impairment wMch will, in reasonable probability, be sus-
<br />lained in the lulure; _ . ,
<br />i. past medipl pre; and _~,~,
<br />j' medpl care which wrll, in reasonable probabihty, be sustained in the ~ ,
<br />lulure: • ~ ~ ~ '. ... .,~},~?. ~~~:.
<br />8
<br />The Plainiill i5 lusher enlilletl to recover pre-judgment and post-judgment
<br />interest al the maximum rate, and to the maximum extent, permired by Texas
<br />law.
<br />NT.VI
<br />(GROSS NEGLIGENCE)
<br />XXV. .
<br />. ~•• Pdor to November 13,1999, the Oefendant had edrrW knowledge that Ns
<br />produd was deledive and that It had fl propensity for causing sedous Injudes. ,
<br />' Despite This knovAedge, the Defendant made a consdous decision not to repg
<br />or remedy Its deledive product. The Defendant's oondud demonstrated en en-
<br />tire waM~olxare so as to establish that Ns condtrd, through hs actions and orris- .:.
<br />' lions, was the resuh of actual oonsdous Inddlerence to fhe dgMs, safety, aild~~- :..
<br />" welfare of the PlalntlN es well es other users end consumers o1 Ns product."
<br />...":~Sfrxx+Iha Defendant knewahad reason to know prior to November:l3,•:. ..: ~.
<br />]989 of the deledive deslgn,.manufedure, end marketing of Ns product; the -~ ~ - ~•
<br />De(endard's conduct was magtlous, grossly negggent, wamon, reckless, end In .' ~.~.:;
<br />... :. .
<br />,.,.
<br />. - -willful disregard of the dghls, heagh,~salety, and well-belrg al'he product's ~-?..'~ ~~: ~'~~~'
<br />users end consumeys, Indudng fhe PlalntiN. TheUefendaid'e grdss negligence ~ :'••'~.
<br />was a' proximate pose of the severe and permanent injudes sustained by Tracy..:'
<br />Clanton.
<br />XXVI.
<br />Solely as a consequence of the foregoing, ilre Delerdan6 C. F. 8 I. is G-. - .
<br />.~ 'able for exemplary and punitive damages far In excess of the minimum Judsda:.~r~-.
<br />tional Gmhs of this Court. .c ~ t
<br />WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Ilse Plaintiff request's
<br />that the Defendant, C. F. 81. be died to appear and answer, and that on final '. '
<br />9
<br />
|