Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />drainage (Smith and Mudder, 1991). The <br />orgatilc layer and drain pipe is then covered <br />with fill and a reclaimed soil and vegetative <br />cover to enclose the entire system to minim;~e <br />infiltration, while promoting evapotranspiration <br />and the necessary anaerobic conditions. Figures <br />2 and 3illustrate across-section of the Biopass <br />System. <br />In the course of evaluating the treatment <br />performance of natural and manmade (i.e., <br />engineered or constructed) wetlands with <br />respect to pH adjustment and metals removal, <br />researchers found that the vegetation <br />communities removed only a few percent of the <br />metals, generally well less than ten percent <br />(Sencindiver and Bhumbla, 1989; Envirortment <br />Canada, 1990). The neutralization of acidity <br />and the precipitation of metals were occurring <br />primazily in the anaerobic sediments beneath <br />the wetland, in which the bacterial reduction of <br />sulfate yielded alkalinity and sulfide as <br />biochemical by-products (IGeittrnan, et al, <br />1986; Kleinman and Girds, 1986). The sulfide <br />produced precipitated the metals as their very <br />insoluble complexes, yielding very low residual <br />dissolved concentrations and very high removal <br />efficiencies up to 99 percent. <br />Although wetlands have proved successful in <br />treating ARD, several disadvantages have been <br />noted, which have limited their application. <br />First, their effectiveness was limited in cold <br />climates in which the ground was frozen for <br />extended periods of the year. Second, the <br />wetlands did not respond well to rapidly <br />changing and elevated flows, which often occur <br />in the spring in mountainous regions, just as the <br />plant and bacterial communities within the <br />wetland are re-establishing themselves. Third, <br />the source of organic matter often became <br />exhausted due to ongoing bacterial activity, and <br />required replacement from time to time. <br />Fourth, the organic matter or submerged <br />anaerobic zone lost its metals removal capacity <br />with time as its available sorptive sites were <br />occupied. Fifth, the metal removal efficiencies <br />decreased with time due to short-circuiting, <br />which resulted in pan from the continued <br />-6- <br /> <br />precipitation of iron and aluminum hydroxides <br />within the submerged anaerobic zone. <br />With the Biopass System, and in this particular <br />situation, many of the disadvantages of <br />wetlands can be circumvented, while taking <br />advantage of the virtues of the bacterial and <br />chemical processes that occur in an anoxic <br />environment. The performance of the Biopass <br />System is not readily affected by temperature as <br />it is designed as an in-situ system in an area of <br />moderate climate. Second, the flows that <br />potentially can enter the system are small and <br />relatively constant. Third, sufficien[ organic <br />matter or compost can be placed in the system <br />to accommodate the anticipated lone term flux <br />of constituents in the drainage, if it occurs. The <br />fact that the organic layer will be placed well <br />below a compacted fill and vegetated surface <br />promotes the necessary anoxic conditions. <br />Fourth, since the heap leach drainage is not <br />acidic and does not contain elevated iron or <br />aluminum levels, the problems associated with <br />precipitation of a large mass of metal <br />hydroxides within the organic layer is avoided. <br />The surface vegetation could be selected on the <br />basis of specific metal uptake, as has been done <br />successfully in the rehabilitation of mine wastes <br />(Money, 1993 and 1994). However, in the <br />current situation, the approach is to bacterially <br />degrade the residual cyanide, while partially <br />reducing the residual rti[rate and sulfate levels, <br />and permanently fixing the precipitated the <br />metals within the subsurface organic layer. The <br />fill and vegetative cover above the organic layer <br />promotes runoff and uptake of solution through <br />capillary action. From a design perspective, the <br />primary concerns are associated with providing <br />sufficient nutrients, moisture, and reten[ion time <br />for stimulation of bacterial growth, acclimation, <br />and degradation. During construction of the <br />system, the organic matter is wetted [o promote <br />anaerobic conditions, to supply the initial <br />moisrure needed, and to encourage bacterial <br />growth. The next section provides a discussion <br />of the basic biochemical processes that occur <br />within the Biopass System. <br />