My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL41966
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL41966
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:10:25 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 11:31:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
9/8/1995
Doc Name
BIOPASS SYSTEM ALTERNATIVE TO HEAP LEACH PAD CLOSURE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.~ <br /> <br />of < 100 mg/1 have been more typically treated <br />(Canby, 1993; Altringer, et al, 1992). At initial <br />wad cyartide levels of <50 mg/l, treated levels <br />of <0.50 mg/I aze achievable, with treated <br />levels of <0.20 mg/1 being reported. <br />An initial growth and acclimation period of 10- <br />15 days is usually needed, along with a <br />degradation period ranging from 10-15 days. <br />For design purposes, a conservarive total <br />retention time for growth, acclimation, and <br />degradation on the order of 20-30 days is <br />recommended for the configuration of the <br />Biopass System. The cyanide would be utilized <br />for energy production, as well as a source of <br />carbon. <br />In the case of the removal of monovalent and <br />divalent metal cations through sorption and <br />sulfide precipitation, an efficiency of 95 percent <br />is reasonable based upon data gathered from <br />bench, pilot, and full scale sulfate reduction <br />systems. Removal efficiencies of up to 99 <br />percent have been reported. A conservative <br />removal efficiency of 50 percent is anticipated <br />for selenium and sulfate, although higher <br />removal efficiencies up to 75 percent have been <br />reported. With an average air temperature in <br />the fifties and an N-situ biochemical system, <br />bacterial degradation and reduction should <br />proceed without climate inhibition. The levels <br />of sulfate, nitrate, metals, and cyanide present <br />in the drainage would be within ranges that <br />have been treated in bench, pilot, and full scale <br />anaerobic systems. <br />4.0 LABORATORY EVALUATION OF <br />THE BIOPASS SYSTEM <br />In order to evaluate the performance of the <br />Biopass System on a more quantitative basis, a <br />long-term continuous flow laboratory study was <br />conducted. The study involved a series of six <br />columns, each filled with a different organic <br />material and fed barren solution taken from a <br />mining operation in Nevada. The analysis of the <br />various barren solutions contained straw only <br />and served as a con[rol. The second, third, and <br />fourth columns contained a composed cow <br />manure. The difference between these colurtuts <br />-11- <br /> <br />was based upon the hydraulic retention times <br />used and whether or not the organic material <br />had been microbially seeded prior to its <br />placement in the column. The fifth and sixth <br />columns contained much more expensive <br />mushroom compost or peat mixed with manure. <br />The organic material placed in colutrms 2 <br />through 6 was mixed with 5% straw to provide <br />additional surface for bacterial attachment and <br />[o minimise COmpaCC10R. <br />The clear Plexiglas columns were six inches in <br />diameter and eigh[ feet in height. A positive <br />displacement pump was used to feed the <br />columns at such a rate to create a fifreen to <br />thirty day empty bed retention period. The <br />seeding of columns 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6 was <br />accomplished by spraying the organic matter <br />prior to its placement within [he column with a <br />mix[ure of solutions collected from various <br />process ponds and soils from around the mine <br />site. The six colutnns were sealed to exclude <br />air, with the effluent from each column <br />reporting to a closed container adjacent to the <br />top of each column [o aid in the removal of off- <br />gases, such as hydrogen sulfide. <br />The presence and/or absence of sulfate <br />reducing, general anaerobic, and denitrification <br />bacterial populations were monitored on a semi- <br />quantita[ive basis with the use of Hach <br />Chemical microbial growth kits. The results of <br />the analyses indicated that large populations of <br />all three of these bacterial types were present in <br />the effluent from the columns. Once the <br />cofutruu filled with barren solutions and <br />effluent began appearing, solution samples were <br />collected for analysis. The results of those <br />analyses are presen[ed in Table 1. <br />As shown in Table 1, the straw column was the <br />least effective in removal of the constituents of <br />interest. The remainder of the columns <br />provided very high levels of treatment of <br />cyanide, mos[ metals, and nitrate, with removal <br />efficiencies exceeding 90% in many instances. <br />The effluent concentra[ions of cyanide, copper, <br />mercury, selenium and nitrate were reduced [o <br />below drinking water standards. The removal <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.