My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL41835
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL41835
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:10:14 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 11:27:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
5/8/1981
Doc Name
MLR APPLICATION
From
ARNOLD & PORTER
To
MLRD
Permit Index Doc Type
PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />nRxc,r.n x r~orzl•r::rz <br />t8r. llavid Shelton <br />May 8, 1981 <br />Page Five <br />land use plan. CRS 34-33-114(2)(d) prohibits t},e granting <br />of a permit which will conflict with a designation of <br />unsuitability. 'Ptre Division should defer its decision <br />pending outcome of the county's Petition. CRS 34-33- <br />126(4) provides that areas under a permit issued by the <br />Uivisior, are nut sub3ect to designation of unsuitability. <br />Thus if the Division were to approve I7estern Fuels' appli- <br />cation before the county has acted, the county would be <br />deprived of its remedies under CkS 34-33-126. <br />The Petition for Unsuitability will be rendered <br />moot if adequate mitigating measures are included in plans <br />for the Deserado Mine. Unless the Division defers its <br />decision, it will force the county to press its Petition, <br />whereas if the Uivision wittrholds its decision, it will <br />allow an opportunity for the county to advise the Division <br />on rnitiyatiny measures wtrictr will bring plans for the mine <br />into conformity with the county master plan, <br />The Colorado legislative <br />surface: miuiny clearly requires <br />decision until the County has a <br />Surface Cual t•;ininy Reclamation <br />Colorado Mined Land 1eclamation <br />ioine curnplianue witn local land <br />scheme for regulating <br />tl,e Division to defer its <br />~teci. [3ot1, the Colorado <br />Act (Coal Act) and the <br />Act (t7on-Coal Act) require <br />use plans.*/ Their <br />*/ `ihe predecessor to these statutes was the Colorado <br />open h;ininy keclamation Act of 1973, which provided, at <br />CRS 34-32-1U9 t}rat ". the department shall not grant a <br />permit ir, violation of city, town, county, or city and <br />county zonirry arrd subdivision reyuiremerrts." The Uivision <br />interpreted this wording as requiring local government <br />approval before the Uivision could issue a mining permit. <br />All al~plicatrts for such permits were required to subr~tit a <br />letter from the local yovernrnent specifying conformance <br />with existing zoning. There is no indication in the new <br />surfacu raining laws that they were meant to disrupt this <br />established and rational order of reviewing proposals for <br />resource. extraction. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.