My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL41835
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL41835
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:10:14 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 11:27:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
5/8/1981
Doc Name
MLR APPLICATION
From
ARNOLD & PORTER
To
MLRD
Permit Index Doc Type
PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~ <br />ATTACHMENT C <br />AFFIDAVIT <br />STATE OF COLOP.ADO ) <br />ss. AFFIDAVIT <br />RIO BLANCO COUNTY ) <br />GLENN L. PAYPdE, being duly sworn,under oath, deposes and <br />says: <br />1. I am the Director of Planning for Rio Blanco County. <br />In [his position I have_primary responsibility for [he County.`s. <br />review of State and Federal Paining plans or applications, and <br />determining the extent to which they are consistent with County <br />policies, programs, and regulations. <br />2. Piy initial review of the L.~estern Fuel-Utah mining <br />plan is that it must include significant Socio-Impact mitigation <br />measures before it can comply with Rio Blanco County's Plaster Plan. <br />The mitigation measures proposed thus far by [Jestern Fuels and <br />"Deseret" which are contained in the final Environmental Impact <br />Statement do not address the basic issues of how the County and <br />its affected municipalities will provide essential community services <br />and housing to meet growth attributable to the mining operations. <br />Failure to include such essential provisions in the mining plan <br />puts Sdestern Fuels at odds with Sections 10, 11, 12, 14, 19, 20, <br />22, and 23 of the County ttaster Plan. <br />3. Accordingly, the proposed mining operation should <br />be designated as "unsuitable for mining"under section (b) (i) of <br />the C.R.S. 34-33-126 until sufficient mitigation measures are <br />incorporated into the plan so tF~at it is consistent with the - <br />County Piaster Plan _- - ~ - ~ ~ - - <br />-~ ~~-C.PiLt~ui oC. (1~ <br />Glenn L. Payne <br />~ Director of Planning <br />' SUBSCRIBED and sworn to before me this 7th day of May 1981. <br />My Commission E:;pires: <br />^;QVember 5, 19E3 <br />,, <br />Notary Public <br />__ ~ .. i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.