Laserfiche WebLink
~~^ ~.; <br />tor. ~tJa I•ieed;l ~• - iiJ Vem VC. ~' ; /, i )ti., <br />9. Pdg° 2, Q`~est.1011 7 - I'}l fl lf'I~) (: U;IC'dC i.!p;i w'.~]1 i;0001' S1!IC2 i,ii2 flflai <br />land use of this site will be pasture. If the area was compacted it <br />vrould be almost impossible to revage[ate tiro area to the proposed final <br />land use. If the financial warranty has not been released and the <br />proposed final land use changes from pasture to housing, the operator <br />would have to submit an amendment to its permit to allow for this change. <br />10. Page 2, Question 5 - Tne approved financial warranty for this sit=_ <br />was set by the Board at $99,000 fora maximum land disturbance at any one <br />time of 57.69 acres. This breaks down to $1,71'0.00 per acre. <br />11. Page 2, Question 6 - The law (specifically C.R.S. 1973, <br />34-32-115(1)(fj) addresses the requirements for re vegetating the area <br />back to the cover amount similar to surrounding areas. The Division has <br />ne jurisdictional authority to specify the density requirements for a <br />re.:laimed area. <br />12. Page 2, Question 7 - The Division has no jurisdictional authority <br />in this area. <br />13. Page 2, Question 8 - Exhibit F incorrectly specified slope <br />gradient. The slopes will be graded to no steeper than 4h :l v. <br />The Division hopes this letter clarifies both the reason the per~~rit was <br />issued prior to the initial notice data and the concerns/comments <br />addressed in the City of Lak.ewood's letter. If you have any questions, <br />feel free to contact this office. <br />Si r.erely, <br />Peter v. J Connor <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />PVOC/t1h <br />cc: I.1r. i•tike Leidich <br />Doc. rlo. 7134 <br />