My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL41634
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL41634
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:09:59 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 11:18:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977208
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
4/20/2004
Doc Name
CKD @CEMEX
From
St. Vrain Valley Community Watchdogs
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Through a Colorado Open Records Act request, Boulder Weekly learned that Carr found 18 alleged air-pollution-control <br />violations, seven of which involve issues related to fugitive dust emissions. Other alleged compliance violations include <br />failure to calculate a variety of emissions correctly from a number of different sources and the failure to report four <br />incidents of "upset condition" in the plant's Semi-Annual Deviation Report. <br />"Upsets" are unpredictable failures of air pollution controls that result in the violation of emissions regulations and are not <br />the resuN of poor management, poor maintenance or carelessness. <br />Boulder Weekly asked to speak directly with Carr, but was not allowed the opportunity. Christopher Dann, spokesman for <br />the state health department, explained that no one in the department would be able to comment on Cam's findings or the <br />oument negotiation with Cemex until negotiations are completed. <br />"All I can tell you is this policy of not discussing matters of negotiation until they're resolved is not something unique to our <br />interaction with Cemex," Dann says. "It's been our policy in the eight and a half years that I've worked here, so it's not <br />anything new. And once negotiations are completed we have never refused to talk to any member of the media-chapter <br />and verse-so I wouldn't expect that it would be any different this time." <br />For other issues, such as enforcement in general, the paper was referred to Perkins, who sits three rungs up the ladder <br />from Carr. <br />County officials likewise declined to comment on the current allegations against the company or the county inspection <br />results that were forwarded on to the state in October 2002. <br />Representatives from the state attorney general's office, which has been working with the health department on the <br />current negotiations, also declined comment, going so far as to say the attorney general was not the expert on state <br />statute when it came to air-quality regulations. <br />Mine Safety and Health Administration officials, who have oversight over worker health and safety issues at the plant, said <br />they are investigating a complaint filed on Nov. 14. <br />"Right now we have an inspector there, along with an assistant, who are investigating the complaint," says Rodney <br />Brown, MSHA spokesman. "We have an inspector (and an assistant] there now, looking into all of this." <br />The complaint includes 11 allegations, Brown says. The specifics of the complaint mirror the allegations made by the <br />insider to Boulder Weekly-poor maintenance, worker intimidation and an unhealthy work environment. <br />"[The inspector's] got a lot of stuff to check out;' Brown says. "He's going to be looking into each of these allegations, [at <br />least] the ones that can be check out." <br />Brown says the agency gets about 100 complaints a year that require a response. <br />"Certainly a good number of them turn out to be frivolous," he says. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.