Laserfiche WebLink
COMPLIANCE ORDER ON CONSENT <br />fa the Maser of CEMEX, INC. <br />AIRS # Ol3/0003 <br />10. Cemex is required to use permit-specific emission factors in calculating the <br />estimated emissions from sources and activities at the Plant for Air Pollutant Emissions Notice <br />("APEN") reporting and fee purposes, and to maintain and make available for inspection records <br />of the calculations upon request. The records maintained by Cemex'used incorrect emission <br />factors to calculate the Plant's emissions of particulate matter ("PM" and/or "PM~o") from the <br />screening and crushing activities, raw material storage silos, Raw Mill Grinding activities, and <br />Homogenizing and Blending activities, in violation of Permit No. 950PB0082, Section II, <br />conditions 6.2, 7.2, 8.2, 9.2, respectively. Additionally, the records maintained by Cemex used <br />the incorrect emission factor to calculate the emissions of hydrochloric acid ("HCl") from the <br />Plant's Clinker Cooler, in violation of Permit No. 950PB0082, Section II, condition 10.10. <br />Cemex has corrected the APEN submittals, and properly paid the emission fees. <br />11. Permit No. 950PB0082, Section II, condition 10.4 establishes PM emissions <br />limits for the Plant's Kiln and Clinker Cooler. The permit requires Cemex to monitor PM and <br />PM10 emissions and to keep production records. Cemex kept production records, but did not <br />calculate PM emissions based on such production records. Additionally, Cemex should be <br />required to maintain records estimating PM and PM10 emissions, on a monthly basis, and should <br />be required to maintain such records a1 the Plant. Such emissions estimates should be calculated <br />in the manner prescribed in Subpart F, section b0.64(b)(1-3). Cemex has agreed to perform such <br />calculations and maintain such records. <br />12. Permit No. 950PB0082, Section II, condition 10.4.4 requires Cemex to operate <br />the Kiln and Clinker Cooler continuous opacity monitors ("COMs") in accordance with Subpart <br />A, section 60.13. Cemex reported opacity exceedance times to the Division, but the exceedance <br />times were not calculated in the manner specified by Subpart A, section 60.13(h). Cemex has <br />since changed its practice to calculate opacity exceedance times as specified in Subpart A, <br />section 60.13. As a mitigating factor, Cemex asserts that it over reported opacity violations. <br />13. Cemex is required to ensure that the paved travel areas used by the front-end <br />loaders and paved azeas of particulate emission producing sources are (I) swept regularly with a <br />high efficiency vacuum sweeper to minimize material buildups, (2) watered as necessary, and (3) <br />vehicle traffic suspended or rerouted if fugitive emissions become a concern Mr. Carr observed <br />significant material buildup and fugitive emissions from the paved areas near the Plant's <br />Outdoor Clinker Storage azea, the result of spillage from the front loader during transference of <br />material from the clinker drop area to the stockpile areas. Water trucks and the vacuum sweeper <br />vehicle were observed on several occasions during the inspections; however, based'upon <br />observations made on March 26, May 2 and May 13, 2003, the frequency of material deposited <br />on the paved areas from the handling of clinker in the Outdoor Clinker Storage area exceeds <br />Cemex' ability to minimize fugitive emissions, in violation of Permit No. 950PB0082, Section <br />II, conditions 3.5.6 and 11.6.6. <br />14. During the inspections, Mr. Carr observed excessive emissions from the Plant's <br />Outdoor Clinker Storage area, noting that, as during the 2002 inspection discussed in pazagraph <br />6 above, such emissions were the result of Cemex' failure to maintain a seal between the hopper <br />and material during loading operations. <br />