Laserfiche WebLink
VAN DERWILT REPORT <br />dipping 30° southwest. Fault displacements vary from 0 to <br />over 200 ft. Faults are commonly indicated by shattered <br />zones over 100 ft, across. Beds in the footwall are <br />invariably offset to the west. Pronounced brecciation <br />occurred at the intersection of these cross-faults with the <br />contact between Devonian [Dyer] or Mississippian [Leadville] <br />dolomite and Pennsylvanian shaly limestone [Belden]. Some <br />of the most important orebodies have been found in these <br />areas, and in addition the breccias have been cited as <br />evidence for bedding faults.2L Brecciation along the <br />dolomite-shale contact diminishes away from the cross- <br />faults. Ore and breccia are virtually concurrent, but <br />neither are continuous along the contact between adjacent <br />parallel cross-faults except locally where the faults are <br />close together. "The obvious relation of this breccia to <br />the cross-faults refutes the idea that they resulted from <br />faulting parallel to bedding." <br />Breccia parallel to beddino, pp. 236-237. Brecciation of <br />dolomite is far more common than of limestone. Brecciated <br />beds of dolomite in [otherwise undisturbed] dolomite is <br />common, and in some cases dolomite beds within limestone are <br />strongly brecciated without detectable disturbance of the <br />enclosing limestone. Vanderwilt believes this style of <br />brecciation was caused by shearing stresses produced by <br />close folding, and that relative movements amounted to <br />[only] a few inches. "Since the brecciation took place <br />along cross-faults where total displacement was unimportant, <br />the breccia parallel to bedding cannot be accepted as <br />evidence of important movement." <br />Relation of breccia to ore deposition, pp. 237-238. The <br />direct relationship of breccia to the ore deposits is the <br />relatively large percentage of open space through which the <br />[mineralized] solutions can circulate. On Smuggler <br />mountain, ore is virtually confined to breccia (whereas <br />there is significant limestone replacement on Aspen <br />mountain); the interbedded shales, dolomites and limestones, <br />and sandstones of the Pennsylvanian Weber [Belden] are more <br />brecciated than the underlying dolomite, and the amount of <br />ore obtained from the dolomite is relatively unimportant. <br />Bearina_of revision on future of the district, pp. 240-241. <br />The general opinion at time of writing [1935] is that the <br />Aspen district is mined out, except possibly at greater <br />depths. Important orebodies on Smuggler mountain have been <br />_` SPDRR MONOGRAPH, 71-72, 74, 88-89, 106, 120-122, 128, 144-145; SPURR <br />REPORT, 306-315. See also, among others, S. F. EHHONS, PRELIMINARY NOTES ON <br />ASPEN, COLO.; A. LAKES, GEOLOGY OF THE ASPEN MINING REGION, PITHIN COUNTY, COLORADO; AND <br />W. E. NEWBERRY, NOTES ON THE GEOLOGY OF THE ASPEN MINING DISTRICT (COLORADO], as cited <br />previously, Part I, ante, pp. 11 and 13, respectively. <br />Bruce A. Collins - 15 - BIaLIGGRAPHx <br />