My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL41483
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL41483
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:09:29 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 11:13:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1995097
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Name
BIBLIOGRAPHY WITH INTRODUCTION GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND LIST OF MINERALS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
INTRODUCTION <br />tremendous amount of energy supplied to Aspen almost exclusively by <br />coal. And coal, high-quality coal, was located nearby in <br />abundance, and considering the technology of the time under <br />conditions that led to remarkably economic extraction. <br />It should come as no surprise that the developers of the <br />largest early mines in the Grand Hogback coal field west of Aspen, <br />in the Carbondale-Glenwood Springs-New Castle area, under the name <br />of the Grand River Coal & Coke Company, were J. J. Hagerman, the <br />president of the Colorado Midland Railway, w. B. Devereux, a mining <br />engineer employed as the general manager of the Aspen Smelting & <br />Mining Company, and Jerome B. Wheeler, one of the original Aspen <br />developers, principal owner of the Aspen Smelting & Refining <br />Company, numerous mining claims, the North Texas Smelter, the <br />Holden Lixiviation Works, the Wheeler Bank and many other <br />businesses. <br />As mines opened up all over the western United States, and <br />indeed world-wide, silver prices which had been as high as nearly <br />$1.40/ounce in the 1860s began a slow decline. Prior to 1873 the <br />U.S. Treasury purchased all silver it was offered at a price ratio <br />with gold of 1 to 16, or about $1.36/ounce. With prices declining <br />on the world market, however, the government decided to purchase <br />silver at the prevailing market price, which declined to <br />$1.15/ounce by the early 1880s. Meanwhile production was <br />increasing rapidly. in Colorado alone silver production increased <br />from 1.5 million ounces in 1872 to 24 million ounces in 1882. <br />In 1878, in an attempt to ease a recession in the West, the <br />U.S. Treasury was ordered to purchase two million ounces of silver <br />a month at market price. Prices stabilized in a range between <br />$1.10 and $1.20 per ounce from 1878 through 1889 but began falling <br />again, dropping below $1.00/ounce in 1886. Finally, in 1890 a <br />populist combination of agricultural interests wanting unlimited <br />silver coinage to push up crop prices and the silver-mining <br />industry convinced Congress to pass the Sherman (Silver Purchase) <br />Act, Act of July 14, 1890, 26 Stat. 732. <br />The Act required the U.S. Treasury to purchase 4.5 million <br />ounces of silver a month, approximately the total U.S. output. In <br />response the price of silver rose abruptly to $1.05/ounce but <br />resumed its decline to $0.99 in 1891 and to a historic low of <br />$0.87/ounce in early 1892. World over-supply was the primary <br />driving force behind silver's market decline. But politicians and <br />miners alike formulated all manner of schemes to prop up the price <br />without restricting production. <br />The "silver question" was a major topic of debate in the <br />1892 presidential election which pitted a Republican indifferent to <br />silver, Benjamin Harrison, against anti-silver Democrat Grover <br />Cleveland. Cleveland, who won by less than 365,000 votes out of <br />BrlICO A. COlllil5 - XV11 - SHUGGLER BIBLIOGRAPHY <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.