Laserfiche WebLink
<br />out the provisions of this title." Courts have used their power <br />under section 1o5(a) in numerous contexts including significant <br />uses of the power to enter orders interpreting, aiding and <br />effectuating plans of reorganization. ee A.H. Robins Co. v. <br />Piccinin, 788 F.2d 994, 1002-3 (4th Cir.) (affirming order under <br />Section 105 staying action against debtor and co-defendant non- <br />debtor), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 876 (1986); In re Johns-Manville <br />Corporation, 97 B.R. 174 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1989)(enjoininq actions <br />to collect on claims outside plan procedures); In re Session, 128 <br />B.R. 145 (Bankr. W.D.N.C. 1991)(order under Section 105(a) <br />appropriate to clarify plan on application of payments to IRS). <br />Here, when the Plan of Reorganization specifically provides that <br />the Court retains jurisdiction "to enter orders in aid of or to <br />interpret the Plan, including, without limitation, appropriate <br />orders to enforce the Plan, and to protect the Debtors, the <br />Reorganized Debtor, and any other entity having rights <br />under the Plan as may be necessary to implement the Plan. " <br />Plan of Reorganization, q 86(d), it is appropriate for this Court <br />to enter the proposed order in aid of consummation. See <br />generally In re Arlington Village Partners. Ltd., 66 B.R. 308 <br />(Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1986) (court is empowered under plan of <br />reorganization to enter orders in aid of consummation). See also <br />Johns Manville, 97 B.R. at 180 (even without specific retention <br />of jurisdiction, bankruptcy court has fundamental power to <br />determine interpretation and administration of plan); but see <br />13 <br />