GENERAL41363 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

! • i~ V` r' L .,. ,. -3- ection 2.03.5 of the application will need to be listing of violation notices received and related by Rule 2.03.4(3)(a) through (f). ~ 1 ~„~ ,,~ updated to include a information as reguired 2. There appears to be a slight disc repancy between the permitted acreage as listed in the application and as depicted on surface and mineral ownership maps. Specifically, the permitted acreage listed on the renewal application form was 340 acres. The acreage listed for the lease modification was 60 acres, a total of 400 acres. Based on the referenced maps, the total permitted area is approximately 415 acres. This ~. discrepancy needs to be addressed and appropriate corrections made. ~3.4 i. :~. ~1 ~c_ ~ ~J 5 Small portions of the disturbed surface area near the common corner of Sections 29, 30, 31 and 32 appear to be owned by two separate individuals, Wiltse and Van Camp, and the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe. A description of the documents upon which legal right of entry for these portions of the surface disturbance area is based should be provided. An updated Certificate of Insurance as required by Rule 2.03.9 will need to be submitted for inclusion in the application document. Various sections of the permit application document contain discussions of surface water drainage facilities and sediment ponds which are outdated or incorrect. Examples are listed below. Page 2.04.5(8) states "all undisturbed water is diverted to the sediment pond on the west side of the access road" and "the second pond handles runoff from the entire disturbed area." Page 2.04.5(9) states "the sediment pond outlets or spillways are constructed of eighteen inch diameter culvert pipe." Page 2.04.7(3), paragraph 1, states "... this pond collects only undisturbed runoff." Page 2.04.7(3) states "the east pond handles runoff from the entire d' turbed area." e Page 2.05.6(3) contains statements which could be interpreted to indicate that all undisturbed drainage from above the mine site would be diverted so as to bypass the sediment ponds and flow directly to the meadow. In actuality, only the east upslooe drainage is diverted, while flows from the west upslope drainage are routed through the west side sediment pond alonq_ with disturbed runoff from a portion of the facilities area. The statements noted above, as well as other sections of the text which address drainage and sediment control should be reviewed for consistency and accuracy, and revisions should be made as necessary to insure that the text is consistent with actual and approved conditions.