My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL41305
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL41305
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:08:44 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 11:08:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
4/11/1986
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance for PR3
From
Permanent Lower Waste Pile
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-49- <br />Underground mining at the Mt. Gunnison Mine has a high potential <br />for affecting springs located in Sylvester Gulch. However, flow <br />from these springs is already diverted into the Tony Bear Pipeline <br />which is now owned by West Elk Coal Company. Most of this water is <br />not used and flows back into the North Fork River. <br />The Mt. Gunnison permit application identified numerous springs in <br />or adjacent to the area to be mined. The application indicates <br />that springs contribute 11 percent of the flow in Lower Dry Fork, 4 <br />percent of the flow in Lick Creek, 12.6 percent of the flow in <br />South Prong, and 0.9 percent of the flow in Horse Creek. FSccluding <br />the Sylvester Gulch data, springs could contribute 6.2 percent of <br />the stream flow for the Mt. Gunnison life-of-mine area during the <br />dry part of the year. In a worst-case scenario, where all of the <br />springs dry up, 6.2 percent of the low flow runoff could be lost. <br />In reality, it is probable that not all the springs would be <br />affected and, therefore, reduction of surface flow would be less <br />than the worst-case scenario. The accuracy of WECC's predictions, <br />and significance of the results will be determined if WECC ever <br />decided to request approval to mine these area. <br />A loss of spring flow may not entirely be lost to the hydrologic <br />system. It may temporarily become a part of the ground water <br />system and eventually reemerge at the surface. It is difficult to <br />predict where this water may reemerge. It could reemerge <br />downstream in the same drainage (the Minnesota Creek system), or it <br />could reemerge along the North Fork of the Gunnison after flowing <br />through the mine workings. In the latter case, the impact upon <br />water users located along Minnesota Creek is potentially the <br />greatest. In either case, flow below the confluence of Minnesota <br />Creek and the North Fork of the Gunnison should not be affected. <br />Withdrawal of Water from the North Fork <br />of the Gunnison for Mine Use <br />Stream flows may also be depleted through the withdrawal of water <br />from the stream or the alluvium of the stream for use in the mining <br />operations. <br />The Terror Creek Coal Yard withdraws water from two sources. Water <br />for dust suppression is supplied by senior water rights from the <br />Deertrail Ditch. The ditch withdraws water from Hubbard Creek. <br />Use averages 5,000 gallons per day. Previously, this water was <br />used to irrigate orchards where the loadout is now situated. A <br />domestic well which supplies about 450 gallons per day is used for <br />domestic use at the loadout office. Since the company has just <br />changed water use Erom agriculture to domestic, there is little net <br />depletion to the North Fork River system. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.