Laserfiche WebLink
18 July 1984 <br />Page 7 <br />There have been no formal calculations done for Overburden Stockpile No. 2, <br />as there is some doubt as to the original topography under the stockpile. <br />Since overburden and interburden from the East and West pits must have been <br />placed in OSiil and/or OSH2, enough yardage must be on the central ridge south <br />of the nose of the ridge to be used in filling both pits. <br />East pit X-Sections and Yardages <br />Section West Side East Side I East Side II Total I Total II <br />3 214 0 0 214 214 <br />4 236 1645 ~ 1645 1881 1881 <br />5 53 3245 1391 329$ 1444 <br />6 0 2049 1413 2049 1413 <br />7 432 2976 1663 3408 2095 <br />8 0 638 638 638 638 <br />9 1622 330 140 1952 1762 <br />10 1249 2705 1403 3954 2652 <br />11 1005 2823 1109 3828 2114 <br />12 867 3845 1697 4712 2474 <br />13 764 8180 1303 8944 2061 <br />14 637 4792 1490 5429 2127 <br />15 1147 7557 1995 8704 3142 <br />16 460 4378 2045 4838 X505 <br />17 378 4177 275E 4555 3136 <br />18 690 7100 2786 7790 3476 <br />19 291 7237 967 7258 1258 <br /> TOTALS 73452 ft2 34398 ft2 <br />73452 X 100/27 = 272044 yd3 Plan I <br />34398 X 100/27 = 127400 yd3 Plan II <br />As indicated above, it is urged that Plan II be adopted by the board, as there <br />is no practical, and realistic advantage to Plan I. <br />A variance for Plan II is hereby requested. <br />