My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL41265
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL41265
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:00:23 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 11:06:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981039
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/30/1983
Doc Name
Informational Letter for NOV-1983-026/grazing sheep
From
MARCH MYATT KORB CARROLL & BRANDES
To
MLRD
Permit Index Doc Type
VEGETATION
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />-37- <br />Establishment of numerous species of minor importance is not required and is <br />probably not feasible. The mining and reclamation process results in rather <br />uniform soil and slope conditions in comparison to the topographic and edaphic <br />diversity of the adjacent undisturbed rangeland. Over time, biological and <br />physical processes such as grazing and erosion will contribute to physical and <br />vegetation diversity on the reclaimed area, as adapted species occupy niches <br />which become available. The revegetation plan and the above diversity <br />standard will insure that the dominant components of the herbaceous vegetation <br />stand are restored. <br />The applicant does not propose to plant or seed woody species on the reclaimed <br />areas. This is as requested by the landowner, Bogle Farms. Based on the <br />proposed post-mining land use and the landowner request, the Division approves <br />the plan and is authorizing a variance from the woody plant density <br />requirements of Rule 4.05.8(7). Potential adverse impacts on wildlife and the <br />potential need for impact mitigation have been evaluated in concert with the <br />Colorado Division of Wildlife. Potential wildlife impacts and mitigation <br />measures are discussed in Section XIII - Fish and Wildlife of this document. <br />The applicant has not proposed a plan for periodic monitoring of revegetation <br />as required by Rule 4.15.1(4). In order to aid in the evaluation of the <br />success of various revegetation practices employed and to document changes in <br />reclaimed communities over time, the Division as a matter of course, requires <br />periodic vegetation sampling. Sampling does not have to be every year, does <br />not have to meet sample adequacy, and can be for a limited number of <br />parameters. The following stipulation is required: <br />Stipulation No. 7: <br />WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF PERMIT ISSUANCE, THE PERMITTEE WILL SUBMIT TO THE <br />DIVISION A PLAN FOR PERIODICALLY MONITORING THE SUCCESS OF <br />REVEGETATION. ALL REVEGETATED AREAS SHOULD BE REPRESENTATIVELY <br />SAMPLED AT LEAST ONCE DURING THE FIRST FIVE GROWING SEASONS, AND <br />PERIODICALLY THEREAFTER UNTIL BOND IS RELEASED. <br />Pursuant to Rule 2.07.6(2)(n), the Division finds that the proposed operation <br />will not affect the continued existence of any threatened or endangered <br />species. No threatened or endangered species have been recorded in the <br />affected vegetation types in Routt County, and none were encountered in the <br />applicant's vegetation survey. <br />The proposed operation is in compliance with the requirements of this section. <br />XIII. Fish and Wildlife - Rules 2.04.11, 2.05.6(2) and 4.18 <br />The fish and Wildlife Resources description is contained in Section II.K of <br />the application. The Fish and Wildlife portion of the reclamation plan is <br />presented on pages V-2 through V-6 of the application. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.