My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL41211
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL41211
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:00:20 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 11:04:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2001001
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
8/2/2001
Doc Name
PHONE CONVERSATION WITH SHIRLEY DENNISON REPORTER WITH DOLORES STAR
From
WALLY ERICKSON
To
FILE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
07/25/2001 17:53 9708824476 DOLORES STAR PAGE 0a <br />• • <br />Erickson said it is not an "overnight process. It takes 90 days to get the application, <br />review it, and verify that it satisfies the statutory requirements. This particular <br />application went 131 days." <br />He continued that the extension was because of significant changes in the application <br />before it was approved. <br />Board order lesued prior to hearing <br />Erickson continued that, prior to the formal hearing before the State Mined Land <br />Reclamation Board, apre-hearing conference was held. "It is basically an <br />organizational meeting, to distill and streamline the issues before the hearing. That <br />way, the hearing can be conducted in a more organized format," he said. <br />This results in a Board order on what witnesses are to be called, how much time they <br />have, and what evidence is to be submitted (to the state board) from the conference. It <br />was, in fact, the first item the board considered in the hearing on the Llne Camp Gravel <br />Pit, Erickson said. <br />The State Board asked if anyone had any objections to the pre-hearing order, Erickson <br />said that no one objected, and the Board then lined out how much time each person had <br />at the hearing. "In fact, the witnesses from CFAR were actually given more time than <br />they asked for," he said. "However, early in the formal hearing, some protested that <br />they had not been given enough limo for research." <br />The State Mined Land Reclamation Board is made up of seven members. They include <br />people from industry, conservation, government, and other interests, and well as <br />private citizens. They are charged with considering every Issue concerning an <br />application, and making sure it satisfies all statutory requirements. "It is a matter of <br />law," said Erickson. "They have to base their decision on all the evidence; on facts and <br />the information made available to them." <br />The local office of the Division of Mining and Gravel had presented a 51-page document <br />to CFAR two weeks prior to the hearing. It outlines and states exactly how and why the <br />decision was made to continue with the application for mining gravel at the Line Camp <br />Gravel Plt. <br />The review of the Line Camp Gravel Pit application was conducted by a team from the <br />Durango DMG office. It Included ErICI<son, who has an extensive background In physical <br />geography and geology of Colorado. The geo-chemistry and water quality issues are <br />reviewed by a staff member with a Ph.D. in geochemistry. The floodplain and flooding <br />issues are reviewed by an expert staff engineer, who is familiar with the area's <br />geology and geography. Erickson said the team invested significant amounts of time to <br />ensure that the statutory requirements on this, and all, applications are met. <br />He concluded, "The record clearly shows that the process was carried out properly and <br />in its entirety. It is not a fast process, and is, of necessity, a team effort on our part." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.