Laserfiche WebLink
As noted above, the existing surface disturbance resulting from surface facilities <br />equals 9.2 acres; .84 acres of access/haul road and 8.36 acres of bench/portal <br />facilities. No further disturbance is proposed. To control runoff from this <br />disturbed area, the applicant has constructed a comprehensive drainage control <br />system consisting of two sedimentation ponds, a series of interconnected buried <br />culverts and an interceptor ditch. Flow from the disturbed area is routed via <br />the culvert/ditch system into the sedimentation ponds. The ponds are designed <br />to contain at least the 10-year, 24-hour storm event; one pond, located at the <br />northwestern edge of the disturbed area, with a 1.5 acre-foot capacity, will <br />hold the flow of a 25-year, 24-hour event without discharge. No discharge has <br />historically been recorded from this system. Division inspection reports <br />indicate the pond remains dry most of the year. This surface water and sediment <br />control system are in compliance and will prevent degradation of surface water <br />quality. Information concerning drainage control structures can be found in <br />Section 2.05.6 and Maps C-4 and C-9 contained in the permit application. <br />The second area of potential impact on water quality may result from the surface <br />manifestation of subsidence. Disruption of the surface could lead to a tear <br />porary increase of suspended solids in runoff from the permit area. Such an <br />impact is not considered significant. This is due primarily to observations <br />from over 40 years of underground mining at the site. These observations indicate <br />little, if any, surface disruption due to past underground mining. <br />Of greater concern is the potential disruption of the small irrigation ditch <br />bisecting the permit area from northeast to southwest roughly along the drainage <br />divide between Pine and Hay Gulch. Here, subsidence would result in a disruption <br />of this supply of surface water. Once again, however, observation from over <br />40 years of mining in this area do not indicate that any disruption of this water <br />supply have occurred. The mine workings, where the effects of rupturing the <br />ditch would be seen, remain dry. To ensure the continued operation of this ditch, <br />the applicant has submitted an agreement from the landowner allowing access to <br />repair any damage and committed to quay rterlU monitoring of the ditch. The <br />operation was found to be in compliance with the subsidence control and monitoring <br />program under XXIII of this findings document. <br />The proposed operation is in compliance. <br />VII. Water Rights and Replacement (2.04.7(3), 2.05.6(3)(a)(ii), 2.07.6(2)(c), <br />4.05.15) <br />As discussed in V, Ground water Hydrology, proposed operations at the King Coal <br />mine are not expected to impact existing water rights to ground water sources. <br />Impoundment of water in sediment control structures will not exceed the allowable <br />2 acre-feet per sediment pond limit established by the Colorado Division of <br />Water Resources. Therefore, no impacts to existing water rights to surface <br />water sources is expected. Since no impacts to existing water rights is antici- <br />pated, no replacement plan is required. <br />The proposed operation is in compliance. <br />