My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL41062
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL41062
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:00:10 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 11:00:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004044
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/22/2004
Doc Name
Letter of Comments to Adams County
From
Mike Lloyd
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
B. Michl Lloyd <br />12202 East 168~h Avenue <br />Brighton, Colorado 80602 <br />Phone 303-659-4545 <br />Fax 303-659-8194 <br />November 15, 2004 <br />Adams County Planning and Development Department <br />Attention: Mr. Christopher C. LaRue, Case Manager <br />12200 Pecos Street <br />Westminster, CO 80234 <br />RE: Response to Request for Comments <br />Case Name: Tucson South Resource Mine <br />Case Number: EXG2004-00004 <br />Dear Mr. LaRue: <br />This is a letter of comments regarding Aggregate Industries' („AI) application for <br />a conditional use permit for major excavation and hauling permit to mine sand <br />and gravel on 290.7 acres located at 13115 E. 160th Avenue ("Tucson South"). <br />AI has another sand and gravel mining operation adjacent to the area they are <br />requesting to mine. This other mining operation is known as the Tucson resource <br />sand and gravel mine ("Tucson Pit's. <br />I have several reasons for commenting to you on AI's proposed Tucson South <br />operation, some of which are as follows: <br />My home is in the neighborhood and part of the proposed operation will <br />be adjacent to my property. The Tucson South operation, as proposed, <br />will have substantial direct negative impact on my neighbors and me for a <br />significant and what I believe to be unreasonable amount of time. <br />AI has not demonstrated their ability to be a 'good neighbor" as <br />evidenced by the fact that the Tucson Pit has been and is an eyesore, the <br />Tucson Pit has what I believe to be significantly dangerous conditions <br />which have not been corrected by AI and AI has historically been very <br />unresponsive to complaints and dealing with issues raised by neighbors in <br />our area. The area proposed for the Tucson South operation is <br />substantially larger than the Tucson Pit and accordingly, will be much <br />more visible to the general public and will have much larger "open pit" <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.