Laserfiche WebLink
12-8a-1997 8:58at-t FROIt ENG. vaES7 ELK h1INE 970 9295E~5Ei <br />SEP-18-1997 12~dd HARbItt, ~pWSOr+ <br />Page Fotlr <br />Mr. TYotm Every <br />Mountain Coal Company <br />601 36~ aa76 P.05 <br />P. 5 <br />t'tardirl9 lawsOn AS60t~ite9 <br />1. Sinex these workings would collect water from a large surface arw of fraztwed <br />rock and coal and then permit the water to flow unrestricted ttrrough a large open <br />void to the area immediately behind the slide mass through the floor, it should <br />significantly shorten the time required to deliver significant pore pressure to the <br />back of the slide. This charaeterisvc should manifest itself as a more rapid <br />response during wet years (or otherwise stated as increase in the acceleration rates <br />during the fall and winter months reducing lag time liom thn onset of significant <br />snow melt aetiviry). <br />~ 2. The storage of a large volume of water vithin the old workings should extend <br />the time ova which wattt and high pore pressure is delivered to the back of the <br />slide. Manifestation of this effect should show up as an extended duration of the <br />period over which acceleration occurs (or otherwise stated as an increase in the <br />accelera4on rate through the spring aAd into the ear]y summer). <br />A review of the monitoring data does disclose that movements on many of the monitoring <br />points have continued to steadily accelerate from year to year since monitoring began in <br />1993 and especially since 1995. We have included several plots of the monitoring data to <br />visually present this information. This data also discloses that the acceleration is greaur <br />during the winter and spring periods and to an extent during the fell seasons with mittimal <br />acceleration over the summer periods. This behavior would tend to support the scenazio <br />of the collection of a large volume of water and development of port pmssure in the old <br />workings. <br />In our opinion direct infiltration of rainwater and snow melt from the ground surface <br />above the slide mass itself either does not contribute or contributes minimally to pore <br />pressure causing movement along the slide plane. Wetting liont progression from the <br />surface at a unit gradient is simply too slow to covet the full 75 to 1W feet of depth in a <br />~ single season and cannot produce the rapid response and short !erg time observed between <br />the onset of snow melt and the acceleration of the slide movement. Therefore it is believed <br />that the water and pore pressure responsible for accelerating slide movements is sourced in <br />areas off the slide mass, higher on the mountain where exposed cracks and joints near <br />outcrop azeas pccmit rapid infiltration into fractured rock and the fractured rock permits <br />relatively rapid delivery of the watK to the base of the slide m:us under pressure. This <br />same mechanism could apply to old warkiags which collect watu i'nrm the same jointed <br />rock masses, from caal scams. and from tension cocks and rubbly zones above subsidence <br />areas to deliver the water and excess pore pressures rapidly to the area lx:hirtd the slide. <br />Both of rhea mechanisms are felt ro be potentially viable mechanisms for reactivating of <br />the existing slide mass. <br />