My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL40820
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL40820
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:59:56 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 10:53:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/25/1985
Doc Name
MEMO PROPOSAL ON MEASUREMENT OF REVEGETATION SUCCESS CRITERIA
From
MLRD
To
GREGG SQUIRE
Permit Index Doc Type
VEGETATION
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />STATE OF COLORADO RIC HnRD ~µ. Gov ernm <br />~ DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />DAVID H. GETCHES, Executive Director <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 718, Denver, Colorado 80203 866-3311 <br />DATE: November 25, 1985 <br />T0: Gregg Squire <br />FROM: M. S. Savag~A~ntrr- <br />~I~ I~~II~II~'ll~'I~ <br />sss ,r, <br />Mined Land Reclametloft <br />D iv lfiOn of MInM <br />Oil antl Ges Conservetlon Comm h,lon <br />D lull ion of Park, & Outtl OOr Rec roetlon <br />` Soil Conservetlan Board <br />Water Conservetlon acerd <br />Div if ion of Water Rsfcurces <br />Division of Wildlife <br />RE: TRAPPER MINING - FILE N0. C-010-81 - PROPOSAL ON MEASUREMENT OF <br />REVEGETATION SUCCESS CRITERIA <br />I have reviewed Trapper Mining's May 25, 1983 corresponsdence and proposal in <br />response to stipulation No. 1 of their permit. As you are aware, the operator <br />was required to propose methods for evaluation of revegetatton success for <br />Division approval. <br />The Division would accept the alternative method for evaluating revegtatlon <br />success proposed in the above-referenced letter, with the following <br />modifications. <br />In short, the operator proposes to use the reference areas (weighted by actual <br />disturbances to each vegetative community) to determine standards for cover <br />and production by which to measure revegetative success. <br />For cover the analysis will take this form: <br />The hypotheses to be tested will be: <br />Ho Pm > .9 Pr <br />Ha Pm ~ .9 Pr <br />Nhere: Pr the average herbaceous plant cover on <br />the reference areas <br />Pm = the average herbaceous plant cover on the <br />revegetated area <br />If the cover on the revegetated area is greater to or equal to 90 percent of <br />the cover on the weighted reference areas the revegetatlon will be yudged <br />successful with respect to cover. <br />If the absolute cover value from the revegetated area is less than the <br />quantity (.9 Pr) a stasittcal test is warranted to determine whether the <br />absolute cover value is within acceptable statistical confidence limits of the <br />standard (i.e., with 80 percent confidence, is Pm > .9 Pr). The <br />statistical <br />measure to be used will be a ~-test as adapted for binomial data, taking the <br />form: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.