My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL40748
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL40748
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:59:53 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 10:50:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
3/17/1992
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance for RN2
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8. Coors Energy Company does not control and has not controlled mining <br />operations with a demonstrated pattern of willful violations of the Act of <br />such nature, duration, and with such resulting irreparable damage to the <br />environment as to indicate an intent not to comply with the provisions of <br />the Act. (2.07.6<2)(h)). <br />9. The Division finds that reclamation operations to be performed under this <br />permit will not be inconsistent with other such operations anticipated to <br />be performed in areas adjacent to the permit area. (2.07.6(2)(i>>. <br />10. The Division currently holds $4,402,022.00 of bond for the Keenesburg Mine <br />in the form of a Corporate Surety. The Division finds that this bond <br />amount is adequate to cover reclamation liability of the site based on the <br />projected worst case disturbance. <br />11. The Division has made a negative determination for the presence of prime <br />farmland within the permit area. The decision was based on a letter from <br />SCS dated May 29, 1981 that demonstrates that no prime farmland mapping <br />units are found within the permit area. See Section 2.04.12(2) of permit <br />(page 101). (2.07.6(2)(k)>. <br />12. The Division has made a negative determination for the existence of <br />alluvial valley floors within the permit area. This determination is <br />based on information provided by the applicant which demonstrates that no <br />alluvial valley floors exist within the mining or adjacent affected area. <br />See I-1 and Appendix I-2 of permit. (2.07.6(2)(k) and 2.06.8(3)(c>. <br />13. The Division hereby approves the post-mining land use of the operation. <br />It was determined that rangeland designation meets the requirements of <br />Rule 4.16 for the permit area. (2.07.6(2)(1)). <br />14. Specific approvals have been granted or are proposed. These approvals are <br />addressed in the following section, Section B. (2.07.6(2>(m)). <br />15. The Division finds that the activities proposed by the applicant would not <br />affect the continued existence of endangered or threatened species or <br />result in the destruction or adverse modification of their critical <br />habitats. (2.07.6(2)(n)). <br />16. The Division has contacted the Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation Fees <br />Branch. As of this time, Coors Energy Company, the operator is current in <br />the payment of reclamation fees required by 30 CFR Chapter VII, subchapter <br />R. (2.07.6(2)(0)). <br />-12- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.