My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL40703
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL40703
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:59:50 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 10:49:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/15/2006
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance for PR8
From
Add 720 acres for King Coal II Mine
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
greater than the head exerted by the mine water. The State Engineer's records show <br />two wells have been completed in the Cliffhouse Sandstone approximately one mile <br />downgradient from the King Coal Mine workings (the V. Paulek and G. Paulek <br />wells). <br />Menefee Formation -Like the Cliffhouse Sandstone, mining impacts to the Menefee <br />Formation aze improbable because it is unlikely the workings of the King Coal and <br />King II Mines will fill with water. <br />Ground water points of compliance aze not warranted for the Hay Gulch alluvium, the <br />Menefee Formation, the Cliffhouse Sandstone, or the Point Lookout Sandstone <br />because, as explained above, the King Coal and King II Mines lack the potential to <br />negatively impact these units. <br />Surface Water Effects <br />With the exception of two small azea exemptions, all runoff from the disturbed azea at <br />the mine site will be routed through sediment ponds. Effects of mining on this water <br />will involve changes in the magnitude and duration of runoff and changes in water <br />quality. <br />The effects on water quantity are expected to be minimal. A decrease in permeability <br />due to the construction or roads and buildings can be expected to cause an increase in <br />runoff amounts. The rate of runoffwill increase over natural conditions because ofthe <br />increased efficiency of conveyance channels. However, these effects are moderated by <br />the detention of runoff in the pond and subsequent evaporation of pond water. In <br />general, only slight changes in the hydrologic balance of surface water aze expected <br />due to the underground mining operations proposed at the King Coal Mine. <br />Changes in water quality can be expected to occur as a result of mining. Increases in <br />erosion rates aze expected from the disturbance of soils and vegetation, however, these <br />aze compensated by deposition of sediment in the sediment ponds. An increase in total <br />dissolved solids (TDS) may occur from well water pumped and used for dust <br />suppression and other operational use. Evaporation of water standing in the ponds may <br />also cause an increase in TDS, although the increase above background concentrations <br />(1500-2000 mg/1) is not expected to be lazge. <br />The Division has determined that probable hydrologic effects on surface water <br />identified above will not preclude use of the water below the point of dischazge from <br />the mine. This conclusion is based on the small and infrequent flows relative to the <br />lazge amount of dilution available in receiving waters. The quality of surface water is <br />limited on site and the treatment systems should act to mitigate any adverse effects on <br />surface water. <br />18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.