My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL40637
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL40637
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:59:47 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 10:47:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980143
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/25/1985
Doc Name
YOUR FILE M-80-143 TEXAS CREEK PIT
From
YATES AND CRANE
To
MLRD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />RUSSELLE YATES <br />R09ERT E. CRANE <br />ALAN G MILL <br />RAYMOND C LEAI(1_ <br />YATES S~ CRANE <br />A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION <br />ATTORNEYS AT LAW <br />P.o. eox z+99 <br />DURANOO. COLORADO 81902 <br />303 23p-2 BBO <br />LOCArIOn <br />November 22, 1985 <br />Mr. Bradford James <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />Mined Lan<i Reclamation Division <br />423 Centennial Building <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />go- r 4.3 <br />Re: Your File: M- <br />Texas Creek Pit <br />Dear Mr. James: <br />]T MuN AVCnU [. <br />Sulr[ 20+ <br />~~~~~~~ <br />NOV 2 51985 <br />f~~~~o GNU r~~ca_araa~r~~~ <br />Colp. Dept. Of f4eWrel iGilAlt-fiAp <br />Reference is made to the November 13, 1985 letter to Steven <br />Zwick, La Plata County Attorney on the above refe[enced pit. This <br />~ letter is to advise you that this firm represents Mr. Terry Sadler <br />who has been one of the complainants relative to the use and <br />operation of the Texas Creek Pit. Because I will be unable to <br />I attend the hearing on November 15, 1985, I would like this letter <br />made a par*_ of the record and to be read to the Mined Land <br />Reclamation Board prior to the transfer of the pit to a successor <br />operator. <br />If the Board would review the September 25, 1985 letter of <br />the County Attorney it will note that certain specific complaints <br />were delineated supporting arguments that the pit was in violation <br />of not only the spirit of the law but the specific letter of the <br />law. The operator is operating the pit less than 200 feet from a <br />residence, was in violation of the permit issued by this very Board <br />in hauling more than 70,000 annual tons, as well as, the question of <br />severe violation of the Colorado Aix Quality Law. <br />Your department was specifically requested to investigate <br />these complaints. It is inconceivable to us that following the <br />letter of complaint of September 25, 1985, made by a governmental <br />agency, i.e. County Government, your department made a one time <br />inspection of the pit. What is even more inconceivable to us is <br />that at the time the inspection was made on October 16, 1985 the pit <br />was not even operating as your inspector made a site visit at 5:00 <br />p.m. in the afternoon. We fail to understand why in the written <br />report submitted by your inspector, not one single reference is made <br />to answer our complaints set forth in the September 25, letter of <br />the County Attorney, the complaints are realleged in this letter. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.