My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL40636
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL40636
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:59:47 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 10:47:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
8/8/1985
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION AND FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Overlying the Wadge is about 560 feet of sandstones, shales, and coal, <br />including the Lennox Coal Seam, which has been eroded away in places. Peabody <br />will mine the Lennox where economical as it occurs in overburden above the <br />Wadge mining areas. <br />Overlying this lower unit of the Williams Fork Formation is the 130 feet thick <br />Twenty Mile Sandstone. The upper most unit of the Williams Fork Formation <br />consists of interbedded sandstones, shales, and thin coals. <br />The applicant has submitted detailed analysis of the geochemical <br />characteristics of the over and interburden found in the Seneca II-W permit <br />area. The parameters which were sampled for were agreed upon by the Division, <br />OSM and Peabody Coal Company. during meetings held in 1980 and 1981. <br />Parameters sampled are listed in the permit application Volume 2, Tab 6, Pages <br />6-9 and 6-10. The permit application (Volume 2, Tab 6, Page 6-11) states that <br />these parameters were used to "...document the physical and chemical <br />properties of the overburden and underburden, to compare these properties to <br />ground water quality, and to determine potential reclamation success." <br />The data obtained from the geochemical analysis was compared to criteria <br />derived from state and Federal agencies (USDA, BLM, Wyoming DEQ, and others). <br />The criteria used for comparison and relative degrees of suitability are <br />listed in Yolume 2, Tab 6, Table 6-3, Page 6-19 of the permit application. <br />The mixing of materials containing these elements during reclamation should <br />dilute any adverse effects which would inhibit revegetation or degrade ground <br />water. In four percent or less of the samples analyzed, pH acid/base <br />potential, boron, manganese, cadmium and zinc exceeded suspect levels. <br />Nitrate-nitrogen levels were excessive in fourteen percent of the overburden <br />core samples taken at the proposed Seneca II-W mine. The locations of the <br />holes which exhibited elevated levels were distantfrom one another. <br />Furthermore, the stratigraphic location of the elevated nitrate-nitrogen <br />samples are not correlative. <br />Due to the vertical and horizontal distances between locations containing <br />elevated nitrate-nitrogen levels, percolating ground water will not be <br />adversely effected. The dilutional effects of a predicted spoils aquifer <br />should buffer the concentration of nitrate as nitrogen by the time the aquifer <br />discharges to the surface system. <br />-15- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.