My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL40594
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL40594
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:59:45 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 10:46:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
4/24/2000
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance for PR5
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
B. The land use within the New Horizon Mine 2 is related to agriculture, Brazing, and <br />related support facilities. Approximately 85% of the proposed permit area is irrigated <br />agriculture. The remaining IS% is composed of sagebrush rangeland, abandoned <br />orchards, farmsteads and facilities. With the exception of replanting the apple orchard, <br />the mine plans to continue the same post mining land uses of irrigated hayland and <br />livestock grazing. The limited acreage of poor condition sagebrush rangeland will be <br />reclaimed to dryland pasture, using introduced forage grasses adapted to the intensive <br />livestock use associated with the mix of irrigated lands and dryland pasture in the <br />permit area. <br />The Division is proposing to approve the existing post-mining land uses of irrigated <br />agriculture, including both irrigated pastureland and irrigated hayland, as well as <br />dryland pastureland, and rangeland supporting livestock grazing and wildlife habitat. <br />(4.16.1) <br />IX. Protection of Fish. Wildlife and Related Environmental Values <br />A. Fish and wildlife habitat is a planned post-mining land use. The applicant has selected <br />appropriate plant species and distributions to benefit fish and wildlife (4.18(5)(1)). <br />X. Operations on Alluvial Valley Floors <br />A. The Division has determined that there aze no alluvial valley floors along Tuttle or <br />Calamity Draws by definition. Geomorphically, these draws aze located in uplands <br />several miles northeast of the San Miguel River. The uplands aze overlain by less than <br />[en feet of unconsolidated material, which has been classified as aeolian and sheet <br />wash material. (The depths of unconsolidated material are documented in Appendix <br />6-1.) These draws would only have intermittent flow if it were not for irrigation return <br />flows and the aeeas aze not naturally subirrigated. <br />These aeeas aze flood-irrigated by waters acquired from a headgate on the San Miguel <br />River, located approximately 15 miles upstream. San Miguel River water quality <br />(TDS of 180 mg/1) is far better than that found in either Tuttle (TDS of 1200 mg/1) or <br />Calamity Draws (TDS of 1950 mg/1). Water from Tuttle or Calamity Draws could not <br />be used for agriculture without very controlled management. <br />The San Miguel River could support several potential alluvial valley floors. However, <br />since the mine areas aze two-and-a-half to three miles upstream, the distance <br />separating the mine from the river is sufficient to mitigate any impacts. In addition, <br />the amount of flow contributed by Tuttle Draw and Calamity Draw to the San Miguel <br />River is very small (0.4 percent of annual mean flow at Uravan). Therefore, the San <br />Miguel River AVFs are considered to be located outside of the potentially affected <br />area. <br />29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.