Laserfiche WebLink
1 i <br />2 <br />31 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 !, <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />• <br />514 <br />rapidly as the plaintiff who testified felt, and I find that the <br />value of the property before the incident was $70,000. The <br />value of the property after the incident, the most convincing <br />evidence, because I concur with Mr. Hanson that Mr. Marion's <br />valuation, in essence, would.be.a valuation of the property after <br />the incident, and his valuation was $56,000. Accordingly, from <br />that point of view, damages of $14,000 should be allotted. <br />In addition to that, there was a Ioss of trees, and I don't <br />~ think that would be reflected, because some of these trees were <br />planted between the times of the loss and the purchase, and I <br />find that to be $1,000. There were fish lost of a value of <br />$250, and a fence of a value of $300, which makes a total damage <br />of $15,550. <br />It is the judgment of the Court that the judgment <br />enter in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendant in <br />the amount of $15,550, plus the cost of this action. Does any- <br />body want any further specific findings so you will have a full <br />record in case of an appeal to a higher court? If not,we will <br />enter judgment. <br />Do the parties want anymore than the customary 15 <br />days for Motion for New Trial? I presume each party may c/ant to <br />consider filing a motion for new trial. Do you want 30 days, any <br />body? <br />MR. HANSON: I would lice 30 days. <br />THC COURT: All right, 30 days for filing Motion for <br />