My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL40258
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL40258
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:59:29 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 10:34:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981022
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/6/1987
Doc Name
Revegetation Issues related to TR-5
From
MLRD
To
SUSAN MOWRY
Permit Index Doc Type
VEGETATION
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mowry - TR 5 Somerset - 3 - November 5, 1987 <br />broadcast seeded at 40 pounds per acre may be excessive, the <br />proposed seed mixture (8 grasses, 5 forbs, and 3 shrubs at 16 <br />pounds per acre broadcast rate) does not appear adequate especially <br />due to the heavy seeding rate for western and slender wheatgrasses <br />and Indian ricegrass (4.1, 3.1 and 3.5, respectively) in relation <br />to the exceedingly low rate for the forbs and shrubs (0.5 and 0.3, <br />respectively). The operator is hoping that ". an acceptable <br />percentage of shrubs should be established by a combination of <br />seeding and natural infiltration." <br />Two of the re vegetation success criteria that must be met to obtain <br />final bond release are species diversity and woody plant density. <br />The proposed seed mixture will have an exceedingly difficult time <br />achieving these two parameters. <br />I would concur with a new seed mixture only if the following <br />modifications are made. <br />a. The seeding rate for the above referenced grasses must <br />be reduced. <br />b. The seeding rate for the forbs and shrubs must be <br />increased. <br />c. The number of shrub species must be increased. <br />5. "Section 2.4 Mulching" proposes increasing the mulching rate from <br />3,000 pounds per acre to 4,000 pounds per acre. I have no problem <br />with this proposed change. <br />6. "Section 2.7 Shrub and Tree Planting" proposes a change from <br />transplanting containerized or bare root stock to no planting at <br />all unless future inventorying identifies a woody plant <br />deficiency. Tne two communities being reclaimed are mountain <br />shrvbland and juniper woodland with a total reclamation area of <br />about 57 acres. I do not concur with the proposed change and <br />believe the planting rate specified in the approved plan should be <br />maintained. <br />7. "Section 2.8 Control of Weeds" proposes a change in controlling <br />weeds from a herbicide control to mowing. <br />Since the submittal of the original revegetation plan, research has <br />begun to show that maybe the weedy component is not as much a <br />problem as everyone once believed. While it is true that weeds <br />utilize soil moisture, it has been shown that this use is off-set <br />by the benefit they provide of stabilizing the surface. The <br />planted species will begin to out compete the weeds because of <br />their deeper root penetration. Also, a majority of the proposed <br />species are cool-season which will compete with the weeds much <br />better than warm-season species. As the planted species become <br />better developed, they crowd out the weedy species thus maintaining <br />soil stability. This process will usually take a year or two to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.