My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL40251
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL40251
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:59:29 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 10:34:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981021
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
7/2/1981
Doc Name
SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN FOR THE NORTHGATE LOAD OUT
From
MLR
To
FLATIRON COMPANIES
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />i <br />DEPARiMOENT OF [NATURAL RESrOURCE~ nMM r,,,v ~•rn nr III III III III IIII III <br />D. MO~te Pastoe, Executive Director <br />M1NED LAND RECLAMATION <br />423 Centennial Building, 1373 Sherman Streel <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. (303) 839-3567 <br />David C. Shelton <br />Director <br />July 2, 1981 <br />Mr. Scott Patten <br />Flatiron Companies <br />P.O. Box 229 <br />Boulder, Colorado 80306 <br />Re: Sediment Control Plan for the Northgate Load-out <br />Dear Scott: <br />I would like to respond to your June 23, 1981 letter regarding plans for <br />sediment control for the Northgate load-out facility. <br />The Division cannot waive the water quality standards and effluent <br />limitations as outlined in 4.05.2. The Division can grant exemptions~- <br />from the requirement to pass all surface drainage through a sedimentation <br />pond (or ponds), or a water treatment facility. In order for the Division <br />to grant such an exemption, the applicant/operator must demonstrate one <br />of the following (in addition to the determination that the area is small <br />in extent) <br />A. Sedimentation ponds and/or treatment facilities are not necessary <br />for drainage to meet the effluent Zimitations of 4.05.2. <br />B. No surface runoff occurs in the area for which the exemption has <br />been requested. <br />C. It is impractical to construct a sedimentation pond due to constraints <br />relative tb size of the affected area. <br />If the Division grants a small area exemption to an applicant and subsequent <br />field examinations indicate that the limitations of 4.05.2 are not being <br />met, the operator must agree to install a conventional sedimentation control <br />system. <br />Upon close examination of the depression existing on site which has been <br />proposed as a sedimentation basin, the staff has determined that structure <br />is unacceptable since the depression is largely filled with tar. <br />Even though the Cumberland Ditch has been abandoned, the staff needs to <br />know whether anyone has water rights to the water which would flow through <br />the ditch, and whether the landowner or lessee plans to utilize it in the <br />future. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.