Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />county commissioners have the authority granted to them <br />under C.R.S. 1973. 24-65.1-101 e>`say. regarding land use <br />planning; deny that such defendants have any authority to <br />issue permits for mining operations; allege that the sole <br />and exclusive authority to grant permits for mining oper- <br />ation: is vested in third-party defendants Oy virtue of <br />G.R.S. 1973. 34-32-109(6) which provides in pertinenet <br />part as follows: <br />(6) No governmental office of the <br />state. other than the board. nor any <br />political subdivision of the state <br />shall have the authority to issue a <br />permit or to require any surety for <br />mining operations. <br />w <br />RESPONSE TO FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF. <br />L0. Third-party defendants incorporate by reference <br />the responses herein above made to paragraphs 1-9 of the gen- <br />eral alleyations in the third-party complaint. <br />11. Deny the allegations of paragraph 11. <br />12. Deny the allegations of paragraph 12. <br />13. Deny the alleyations of paragraph 13. <br />14. Deny the allegations of paragraph 14. <br />RESPONSE TO SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF. <br />I5. Third-party defendants incorporate by reference <br />the above reSpOnSeS t0 pdrdgraph5 1-9 inC1U5iVe Of the gen- <br />eral allegations in the third-party complaint. <br />lb. Third-party defendants are without sufficient <br />information to form a belief as to the truth of the allega- <br />tions of paragraph 16 and therefore deny the same. <br />17. Deny the allegations of paragraph 17. <br />-3- <br />