My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL40075
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL40075
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:59:21 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 10:29:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
8/6/1996
From
LARRY MAUTZ
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
fiUG- 6-96 TUE 12:43 P. 02 <br />~\ y <br />.~^ <br />permittae must correct any material damage <br />resulting from subsidence Caused to surface <br />lands, to the extent technologically and <br />economically feasible, by restoring the land <br />to a condition capable of maintaining the <br />value and reasonably foreseeable uses that it <br />was Capable Of supporting before subsidence <br />damage. <br />Am I wrong in reading these sections and understanding that they <br />(West Elk Mine\Mountain Coal\ ARCO) are responsible. Am 3 also <br />wrong? In that there is no help from anyone to force them to <br />conform. Is it true the only way to get these things repaired is <br />in the courts? IS there no federal statute which requires these <br />peopie to be directly responsible today? This appears to be a <br />deliberate effort to destroy our livelihood, by allowing them to <br />extract ore at any cost to the surface owner with out <br />compensation. <br />Is it true the only way we can recover damage is to finance a <br />lawsuit against West Elk Mine\ Mountain Cosl Mine \ Arco, at a <br />cost of $250,000 with the possibility of never recovering any <br />money? Is this what we are looking at, or is there some other <br />solution? <br />You need to communicate with up most hast. I have 59 hunting <br />guest, and 20 cattle round-up quests prepared to arrive at this <br />ranch in the next few months with thousands of dollars at stake. <br />Along with the well being of these guest. Is the federal <br />government (as the owner of the resource) responsible for the <br />surface and the safety of our quests, or is that responsibility <br />to just the surface owner? And maybe the permittee, if we define <br />blame in the courts. Who is the federal police force of their <br />action? <br />I understand that as Mike <br />which under your care. <br />the p sl llity to destroy <br />to u . <br />mentioned you have a lot of things <br />But we are.in a situation which has <br />every opportunity which is available <br />Y <br />Mautz <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.