My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL39876
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL39876
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:59:13 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 10:24:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/14/1985
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance for PR4
From
Addition of 320 Acres
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-42- <br />Using an estimated concentration of 5,000 mg/1 and an estimated <br />discharge of 0.03 cfs, the effects of the waste rock piles and mine <br />water drainage upon the North Fork of the Gunnison under average flow <br />conditions can be estimated. <br />Cd = (432 cfs)(95 mg/1) + (0.25 cfs)(4,000 mg/1) + (0.03 cfs)(5,000 <br />432 + 0.25 + 0.03 <br />Cd = 97.6 mg/1 <br />This results in a 2.6 mg/1 increase over baseline conditions, which <br />is insignificant. In addition, it is probably an over estimation, <br />since seepage in the piles is the result of snowmelt and would <br />probably occur when stream flows are much higher than average. <br />Natural faults and fractures, as well as fractures caused by <br />subsidence, could reduce streamflow by directly diverting surface <br />flow and alluvial ground water into the bedrock ground water <br />system. This effect is undesirable both because of the hydrologic <br />effects and the mine operation problems it could induce. <br />Experience with underground mines throughout the state, as well as <br />in the North Fork area, indicates that mine inflows are not <br />normally significant when ephemeral streams are undermined. Most <br />of the streams to be undermined in the region are ephemeral and <br />would not be expected to be significantly affected by mining. Flow <br />in these ephemeral streams are concentrated in periods of snowmelt <br />and high intensity precipitation events. The stream gradients are <br />steep and their channels contain little alluvium. For all of the <br />above reasons, very little surface water is retained long enough in <br />the stream valleys to infiltrate into the ground water systems. <br />Therefore, the amount of water observed reaching the mine workings <br />is insignificant. <br />Perennial streams, however, may experience significant depletions <br />of flow if mine workings are extended adjacent to and/or below the <br />level of the stream valley (e.g., the bedrock alluvial contact). <br />The lower stream gradient and the thicker alluvial deposits in <br />perennial stream valleys favor flow retention and recharge to the <br />ground water systems. Due to the increased flow retention and <br />ground water recharge in perennial stream valleys, there is a <br />greater potential for stream depletions by mining adjacent to or <br />under these stream valleys. The mine could generate depletions by <br />increasing mine inflows in the area. These mine inflows could be <br />induced either through the mine workings encountering existing <br />faults or fractures or strata recharged by the stream, or through <br />the mine producing subsidence fractures which extend to the stream <br />valley bottom or to rock strata recharged by the stream. <br />Two mining operations, Mt. Gunnison and Somerset, will undermine <br />perennial drainages, and one mining operation, Blue Ribbon will be <br />mining adjacent to a perennial drainage tributary to the North Fork <br />of the Gunnison. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.