My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL39876
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL39876
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:59:13 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 10:24:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/14/1985
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance for PR4
From
Addition of 320 Acres
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-11- <br />Although underground mining would occur in areas adjacent to the <br />alluvial valley floor, all surface disturbances are located more than a <br />mile upstream from the alluvial valley floor. The alluvial valley <br />floor would not be undermined by the proposed operations. <br />2. The proposed surface coal mining operations would not materially damage <br />the quantity and quality of water in surface and underground water <br />systems that supply those alluvial valley floors or portions of <br />alluvial valley floors. <br />All of the surface flow from the permit area drains to the North Fork <br />of the Gunnison. The applicant has monitored the largest two drainages <br />crossing the permit area. During this period, Lone Pine Gulch has <br />experienced no flow. Sylvester Gulch has experienced ephemeral stream <br />flow. The record yield of 208 acre -ft/yr. in 1978 is less that 1% of <br />the mean annual flow in the North Fork of the Gunnison River. Surface <br />flow supplied to the alluvial valley floor along the North Fork comes <br />primarily from areas upstream from the proposed permit area and this <br />flow is regulated by Paonia Reservoir located approximately 6 miles <br />upstream of the alluvial valley floor. Mining operations would require <br />approximately 150 acre-f t. of fresh water per year for sanitary and <br />drinking water. The possible effects of this water removal upon the <br />water supplied to the alluvial valley floor has not be assessed. <br />The applicant's discussion of probable hydrologic consequences has <br />identified no anticipated changes in surface water quality. All runoff <br />from disturbed surface areas, including runoff from the waste disposal <br />site, would drain through an approved sediment control system. All <br />discharges would be made under the conditions of the applicant's NPDES <br />permit, and any effluent must meet the water quality standards for the <br />receiving streams. If necessary, discharges would be treated to assure <br />compliance with water quality standards. As a result, no degradation <br />in the quality of surface waters supplied to the alluvial valley floor <br />is anticipated. <br />Any ground water supplied from strata with the potential to be affected <br />by the proposed operations is probably minimal. No major aquifers have <br />been identified in either the coal seam or the overburden. Springs in <br />the area are associated with lenticular sands, local faulting and <br />fracturing, and landslides. Most of the springs in or adjacent to the <br />5-year permit area are located along Sylvester Gulch (see Exhibit <br />2.6.2.A). Since part of this watershed would be subject to subsidence, <br />some of these springs could dry up. However, these springs, which <br />supply less than 50% of the flow in Sylvester Gulch, are currently used <br />as a water source for the Tony Bear Pipeline. Loss of this water would <br />not significantly decrease the water supply to the alluvial valley <br />floor. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.