My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL39823
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL39823
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:59:10 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 10:22:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2003037
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
1/14/2004
Doc Name
Petition For Reconsideration
From
AGO
To
MLRB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
required by C.R.S. Section 34-32.5-116(4)(q)(1). The commitment to <br />mine at a 3:1 slope means that no backfilling of highwalls will be <br />necessary. <br />4. The weight of the evidence demonstrates that the Applicant has met the <br />minimum requirements of Construction Materials Rule 3.1.5(4). <br />J. Disposal of Refuse in a Manner that Controls Unsightliness <br />1. Construction Materials Rule 3.1.5(5) requires an applicant to handle and <br />dispose of refuse and acid-forming or toxic materials in a way that controls <br />unsightliness and protects the drainage system From pollution. <br />2. The Objectors assert that the Applicant has failed to comply with <br />Construction Materials Rule 3.1.5(5). <br />3. The Applicant is not expected to encounter acid forming or toxic materials <br />in the excavation process. Other aesthetic issues have been addressed <br />through the Montrose County Conditional Use process and are not within <br />[hejurisdiction of the Board. <br />4. The weight of the evidence demonstrates that the Applicant has complied <br />with the minimum requirements of Construction Materials Rule 3.].5(5). <br />K. Adequacy ofthe Proposed Financial Warranty <br />1. Construction Materials Rules 4.2.1 and 6.4.12 set forth financial warranty <br />requirements, including that they be set at levels reflecting the current cost <br />of fulfilling the requirements of a given reclamation plan and that they <br />provide a breakdown of estimated reclamation costs. <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.