My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL39801
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL39801
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:59:09 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 10:22:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
8/17/1992
Doc Name
SEDIMENT LOADING TO THE RITO SECO
From
MLRD
To
LAND & WATER FUND
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
e~ <br /> <br />III III III III IIII III • <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />t 3 t 3 Sherman St.. Room 2 t 6 <br />Denver. CD 80203 <br />303 866 3567 <br />Ra x. 303 832-8106 <br />August 17, 1992 <br />Mr. Roger Flynn <br />Land And Water Fund <br />1405 Arapahoe, Suite 200 <br />Boulder, Colorado 80302 <br />RE: Sediment Loading to the Rito Seco <br />Dear Roger: <br />STAT~bF COLORADO <br />pF,p~r-0 <br />~e <br />.~~~"~ <br />• 3i,~.,~ <br />~ r876 <br />Ray Romer. <br />Governor <br />Michael G. Long, <br />Dlvisicn Drtecior <br />Thank you for your correspondence concerning sediment =_oading to <br />the Rito Seco. We will, over the next couple of months be in <br />contact with the Soil Conservation Service to discuss available <br />options to deal regionally with sediment loading to the river. <br />Also, I will contact Dave Bucknam concerning options under the non- <br />point source program. <br />From an enforcement and inspection standpoint, we will continue our <br />elevated inspection frequency until the cyanide is back at <br />permitted levels and the INCO process is fully functional. During <br />that time period all aspects of the mine site will continue to be <br />inspected. However at this time, our inspection report: indicate <br />that the operation is in compliance, with the exception o= cyanide. <br />As you know, when a permit is approved, it is approved on the basis <br />that its operations will minimize impacts to the hydrologic balance <br />(See Rule 2.1.1.(8)(b)(iii). According to Rule 6.:? (1)(b), <br />minimization means compliance with applicable Federal and state <br />water quality laws and regulation. We have no information to <br />suggest that a water quality violation has occurred from sediment <br />loadings. If that event should happen then we may be in a joint <br />action with the WQCD. <br />As a more positive approach, all mine operators are required to <br />file an application for an NPDES storm water permit by Ctctober of <br />1992. That permit will require an operator develop a Storm Water <br />Management Plan (SWMP) to control storm water runoff pollution by <br />a specific date. If there are any inadequacies in the operations <br />sediment control practices, the storm water permit and SWMP will <br />address them. <br />The SWMP will not be tied to meeting a numeric standard, but will <br />require a commitment to specific storm water runoff sediment <br />control practices. I see the storm water program as a sediment <br />minimization program. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.