Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Gale A. Norton <br />Attorney General <br />Raymond T. Slaughter <br />Chief Deputy Attorney General <br />Timothy M. Tymkovich <br />Solicitor General <br />OF' C~(O <br />~~ w ~ • <br />1 N 1Nyl= , <br />* X876 ~` <br />ul~~ ~fatr of C~Inlnrn~n <br />DEPARTMENT OF LAW <br />OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL <br />July 16, 1992 <br />M E M O R A N D U M <br />TO: Steve Renner <br />Coal Program Supervisor <br />Division of Mines and Minerals <br />FROM: Frank R. Johnson <br />Assistant Attorn~~ral <br />RE: Harrison Western Corp.'s culvert <br />110 t6th Street - 10th Floor <br />Denver, Colorado 80202 <br />Phone 620-4500 <br />FAX (303) 620-4730 <br />You have requested an ?.nformal opinion concerning the Division's <br />liability stemming from the approval of the design and location <br />of a culvert installed at the GEC mine site by Harrison Western <br />Corp. ("HWC"). Dr. Corley alleges that the culvert trespasses <br />onto an area leased by Energy Fuels. David Neslin, attorney for <br />HWC, in his July 6, 1992 letter to Dr. Corley, asserts that the <br />"Division would be responsible for, and bear the cost of, remov- <br />ing the culvert...." It is my opinion that the Division has no <br />such responsibility. <br />This matter involves a property rights dispute between HWC and <br />Dr. Corley. Section 34-33-110(2)(j), C.R.S. (1984) specifically <br />denies the Division the jurisdiction to decide such disputes. <br />HWC installed the culvert in order to avoid the forfeiture of its <br />reclamation bond. The Division evaluated the design and location <br />of the culvert for compliance with the Colorado Surface Coal <br />Mining Act, but has no obligation or authority to review title to <br />the real property. HWC bears the responsibility for ensuring <br />that its maintenance and reclamation activities do not violate <br />applicable laws oc property rights. <br />