My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL39774
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL39774
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:59:08 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 10:21:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
8/3/2005
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance for RN2
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
* establishment of rock and slash piles for cover and roosting areas in <br />the reclaimed azeas, <br />* avoidance of disturbance in buffer zones in bottomlands, <br />* avoiding disturbance of active raptor nests in the disturbed azea <br />and/or relocating those nests. <br />1. The applicant has proposed the use of persistent pesticides on the site <br />during mining and/or reclamation operations. One or more of seven <br />herbicides listed in Table 22-11 of the permit application maybe used <br />to control noxious weeds in the mine area. The Division proposes to <br />approve this usage. (4.18(5)(g)). <br />2. Fish and wildlife habitat is a planned post-mining land use. The <br />applicant has selected appropriate plant species and distributions to <br />benefit fish and wildlife. Refer to Section VIII of this document for <br />additional discussion of the revegetation seed mix. (4.18(5)(1)). <br />X. Operations on Alluvial Valley Floors <br />Two alluvial valley Moor (AVF) studies were performed on Sage and Grassy Creek and <br />their tributaries in the vicinity of the proposed Yoast permit area. This information is <br />found in Tab 16 of the permit application package. <br />As a result of 1992-93 AVF studies, Seneca Coal Company concluded there are no <br />AVF's in the Grassy Creek watershed in hydrologic communication with the proposed <br />Yoast Mine. Based on information presented by the applicant, discussions with the <br />Routt County office of the Natural Resource Conservation Service, interviews with <br />farmers, and field reconnaissance, the Division agrees with the applicant's conclusion. <br />No alluvial valley floors exist in the permit azea or the adjacent Grassy Creek <br />watershed, which are in hydrologic communication with the proposed Yoast Mine. <br />As a result of 1990 AVF investigations in the Sage Creek watershed, Seneca Coal <br />Company concluded there are no AVF's in this basin in hydrologic communication with <br />the proposed Yoasf Mine. Based on information submitted by the applicant, Feld <br />reconnaissance, interviews with farmers, and previous findings by the Division and the <br />applicant related to the Seneca II-West Mine, the Division does not concur with the <br />applicant's conclusion. The Division concludes that two azeas along Sage Creek <br />downstream from the Yoast permit area meet the regulatory definition of alluvial valley <br />floors. These azeas aze discussed below. <br />Sage Creek Reservoir Site <br />Two fields located just upstream from the former Sage Creek Reservoir dam (Sections <br />13 and 18) aze identified in the Yoast application as subimgated native wetlands and <br />subirrigated grass hay. The native wetland azea is basically the azea once covered by <br />Yoast Mine 3 g August 3, 2005 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.