My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL39694
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL39694
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:59:05 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 10:18:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977378
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
9/2/2005
Doc Name
Letters Dated October 7 2004 and October 12 2004
From
Sunnyside Gold Corp
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Sep D2 O5 02:24p <br />Pre-bulkhead Quality <br />Sunnyside Gold <br />970 387 5310 <br /> FlowtEaml dAl dCd dCu dFe dPb dMn d7,n <br />Spring(mg/1) 36 360 0.605 67.7 1462 0.166 87 216 <br />Spring(Ib/day) 36 ] 55 0.26 29 631 0.07 38 93 <br />Fall(mg/l) 4 360 0.605 67.7 1462 0.166 87 276 <br />Pall(16/day) 4 17 0.029 3.2 70 0.07 4 10 <br />2001 Sample Results <br />Spring(mg/1) 38 78 0.21 132 29] 0.04 28 46 <br />Spring(Ib/da y)38 36 0.1 6.0 ]33 0.02 13 2] <br />Fall(mgll) 29 55 0.15 13.1 207 0.08 39 41 <br />Fall(Ib/day) 29 19 0.05 4.6 72 0.03 14 14 <br />It was explained in this annual report that the metal loading of concern has remained constant. <br />hhe 2002 sample results were consistent wirh these results. Monitoring fir TR-14 ended after [hc 2002 <br />season. This was one more year than was required by TR-14. <br />p.5 <br />The only other variation from pre-bulkhead monitoring results observed during the TR-14 monitoring <br />period was site M-1 (Mogul). This site was addressed through Amendment No.4 to the Consent Decree. <br />SGC believes it has minimized impact to the hydrologic balance, satisfied the terms of the Consent <br />Decree with WQCD-CDPFIE and TR-14 with the DMG. Please advise me if these answers do not <br />adequately address the questions presented in the October 5, 2004 letter. <br />October 12, 2004 Letter <br />In summary, the October 12, 2004 letter requests SGC to address the hydrologic implications of <br />Mr. Fearn's indication direct discharge to Cement Creek after lime addition may be necessary and <br />his plan to construct facilities within SGC's permit area. <br />The questions presented in this letter were based on conversations between Mr. Fearn and the DMG <br />indicating how GKMC may respond to their eviction from the sedimentation ponds. The potential actions <br />this letter requests answers for did not occur and are basicly addressed in Items 11 and IV of the October 5, <br />2004 (ester above. <br />Please contact me if you have any questions or wish to discuss these responses. <br />CC: Wally Erickson <br />Sincerely, <br />~~~~, P~ <br />Larry Perino <br />Reclamation Manager <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.