Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> mornings and the last 1-1/2 hours of light in the evenings. The purpose of <br /> these flights was to conduct cow/calf counts on three impacted sites (Colorado <br />' Yampa Coal Company, Mine 1; Seneca, Mine II; Pittsburg Midway, Edna Mine) and <br /> four control sites (Middle Creek, Quarry Mountain, Thorpe Mountain, Dunckley <br />' Flat Tops and Little Flat Tops). Each area was flown on two separate days. <br />' Calving Home Range Fidelity <br />In order to determine what fidelity elk exhibit for calving areas and <br />' make statistical comparisons between elk using mine areas and control areas, <br />home ranges for each elk were determined using Mohr's (1947) minimum convex <br />' polygon method. Two different home ranges were calculated for each elk. Ob- <br />servations between May 15 and June 30 were used to delineate the general <br />calving home range. Data gathered from May 25 to June 15 were utilized to <br />' identify the refined calving home range. These home ranges were then used to <br />estimate year to year fidelity by planimetering the amount of overlap between <br />' home ranges in consecutive years. The area of overlap was then divided by the <br />smallest of the two overlapping home ranges to give a relative percent <br />' overlap. <br />' As <br />t <br />" another index to <br />Di <br />d Ch fidelity, centers of activities ("arithmetic mean <br />t <br />i <br />" <br />Wi <br />1975 <br />l <br />1980 <br />" <br />t <br />V <br />kl <br /> cen <br />er <br />, xon an <br />apman geome <br />r <br />c cen <br />er <br />, <br />n <br />) were ca <br />- <br />; <br />an <br />e <br /> culated for each calving home range. The distance between year to year <br />' calving home range activity centers was then measured. <br />' Analysis of variance and Duncan's multiple range test were then used to <br />determine differences (in home range size, relative percent overlap, and dis- <br />tance between activity centers) between elk using mine sites and control <br />areas. Analyses were run on an IBM using the Statistical Analysis System <br />' (SAS) computer programs. Significant levels used were d = 0.05. <br />Habitat Utilization <br />1 Vegetation maps were prepared as described in the 1983 annual report. <br />' Transmitter collared elk locations and calving home ranges were then placed on <br />vegetation maps. Utilization was then determined by calculating the percen- <br />tage of locations within each vegetation type. Habitat selection was then <br />1 <br />-6- <br />