Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2.0 SAMPLING METHODS <br />2.1 Sample Layout <br />The sample layout protocol for the revegetation evaluations in 2006 largely followed procedures <br />detailed in permitting documents. These procedures are designed to better account for the <br />heterogeneous expression of established vegetation within the various reclaimed areas while precluding <br />bias in the sample site selection process. By design, the procedure is initiated randomly, and thereafter, <br />samples are located in a systematic manner, along grid coordinates spaced at fixed distances, e.g. 125 ft. <br />(see Figure 1, lower left corner and Maps 1 & 2). In this manner, "representation" from across the entire <br />reclaimed area is "forced" rather than risking the chance that significant pockets (or seedings) are <br />entirely missed, or overemphasized as often occurs with simple random sampling. sample site selection <br />within the established reference areas occurred in a similar manner. <br />The procedure for sample location within the reclaimed area or reference areas occurred as follows. <br />First, a fixed point of reference that could be relocated from year to year was selected. In 2006, the <br />fixed reference point was the center of a dry sediment pond (see Map 1). Use of this point facilitated <br />location of the systematic grid in the field. Second, a systematic grid of appropriate dimensions (e.g., <br />125 ft. X 125 ft.) was selected to provide approximately 30 to 35 coordinate intersections within each <br />sampling unit, which could then be used for sample sites. Third, a scaled, computer generated <br />representation of the selected grid was overlain on a computer generated map of the area utilizing north- <br />south and east-west compass points which could be easily established in the field. This overlain grid also <br />facilitated identification of the vegetation type for each sample point. Initial placement of the grid was <br />controlled by the fourth step, selection of a pair of random numbers (between 0 and 200 ft.) to facilitate <br />location of the initial coordinate point from center of the sediment pond. In 2006 these random <br />coordinates were 101'(west) and 66' (south) for the revegetated Riparian Area and 62'(west) and 56' <br />(south) for the revegetated Grassland Area. Fifth, utilizing a hand held surveying compass and hip-chain <br />(or pacing techniques) all sample points were located in the field and flagged. The locations of all <br />sample sites utilized during 2006 sampling efforts are indicated on Maps 1 and 2. <br />Once a selected grid point was located in the field, sampling transacts were always oriented in the <br />direction of the next site to be physically sampled to further limit any potential bias while facilitating <br />sampling efficiency. This orientation protocol follows that which is indicated on Figure 1. Depending on <br />logistics, timing, and access points to the target sampling area, the field crew would occasionally layout a <br />set of points along coordinates in one direction and then sample them in reverse order. However, <br />CEDAR CREEK ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 4 Blue Ribbon Mine - 2006 <br />Phase III Bond Release Evaluation <br />