My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL39459
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL39459
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:58:54 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 10:10:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/5/2007
Doc Name
Mining Plan Decision Document Federal Lease C-1362 (TR109)
From
Mountain Coal Company, LLC
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Other Permits
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> <br /> <br />(Alternative 3), the Forest Service considered <br />several alternatives in response to issues raised by <br />the interdisciplinary team, national policy changes, <br />and input from other agencies, associations, and the <br />public. Due to public concern, the alternative that <br />eliminated activities within IRA is now considered <br />in detail. In the Draft EIS, it was considered but <br />eliminated from detailed study. <br />Alternative 1 - No Action <br />Under the No Action alternative, current <br />management plans, existing approvals related to <br />coal mining, and non-coal related activities would <br />continue to occur or guide management of the <br />project area. <br />Alternative 2- The Proposed Action <br />Under the proposed action operations associated <br />with accessing, drilling, constructing, operating, <br />and reclaiming 168 MDWs on 146 drilling <br />locations, and one ventilation escapeway shafr, and <br />associated road construction or reconstruction <br />would occur. A portion of these activities is <br />proposed in the West Elk IRA. Operations related <br />to these authorizations aze expected to begin late <br />summer 2007 and continue for about 12 years <br />(Figure S-3). Five of the drilling locations would <br />also serve as staging areas. An additional six <br />staging areas may be used, two of which are <br />currently reclaimed areas. <br />The proposed action alternative includes granting <br />relief from the lease stipulation on federal coal lease <br />C-1362 that restricts activities between December 1 <br />and April 30 for the protection of big game winter <br />range to facilitate construction of the Deer Creek <br />shaft. Additionally, it would grant relief from a least <br />stipulation limiting occupancy in riparian areas, <br />wetlands and floodplains specifically any riparian <br />crossing with a road (this would primarily occur <br />near the Dry Fork of Minnesota Creek and involve <br />approximately 10 acres of ripazian vegetation and <br /><1 acre of wetland vegetation, See Chapter 3 <br />Vegetation for further discussion of effects). <br />Specific activities involved in the Proposed Action <br />aze given below: <br />Deer Creek Shaft Includes: <br />• Constructing a ventilation shaft to create an <br />airshaft 20 to 28 foot diameter by 400 feet <br />deep. <br />• Constructing an emergency escapeway 6 to <br />6.5 feet in diameter by 400 feet deep. <br />Constructing an enclosure (20 foot by 30 foot <br />steel-sided shed) for the emergency escapeway <br />and electrical generation equipment for <br />emergency escape hoist. <br />Shag and escapeway would use a previously <br />approved and constructed pad and access road <br />southeast of Minnesota Creek Reservoir <br />(Figure S-3). <br />Performing Operations and Maintenance. <br />• Performing interim reclamation on pad and <br />light-use (low-volume) road once shaft and <br />emergency structures aze constructed; and <br />• Sealing airshaft and escapeway with <br />concrete/steel structure 10 feet below ground <br />surface and performing final surface <br />reclamations when no longer needed at end of <br />life of mine (mine life estimated at 13-IS <br />yeazs). <br />The Proposed Action includes analysis of the most <br />surface disturbing method of shafr construction <br />(conventional methods). However, constmction <br />activities, as planned, may be significantly less <br />disturbing than the use of differing technology. <br />Disturbed azea for the shaft is estimated to be 4 <br />acres. Sub-soil stockpile is anticipated to be piled <br />directly east of shafts. The only facilities visible on <br />the surface associated with the ventilation shafr will <br />be the collar and exhaust equipment. <br />Anticipated noise and vibration issues include large <br />frequent blasts, hoisting machinery, muck handling, <br />ventilation fans, and large diesel powered <br />generators. <br />E Seam Methane Drainage Wells (MDW) <br />Includes: <br />Drilling and casing of up to 168 MDWs <br />located on up to 146 drill locations over 12 <br />years on NFS lands. Five of the drilling <br />locations would also serve as staging azeas. <br />An additional six staging areas may be used, <br />two of which are currently reclaimed areas. <br />For analysis purposes, road corridors and drill <br />pad window locations were used to facilitate <br />optimal placement of facilities in the field. <br />Therefore, the NEPA analysis over-estimated <br />the amount of ground disturbance. The actual <br />on-the-ground disturbance for roads in the <br />comdor and on MDWs in the window will be <br />S-4 Deer Creek Ventilation Shaft and E Seam Methane Drainage Wells FEIS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.