My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL39413
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL39413
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:58:52 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 10:09:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Name
Dec Document for Federal Lease COC-56447
Permit Index Doc Type
Other Permits
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
both seams will be mined, maximum subsidence do the tract is predicted to <br />be 10.22 feet. <br />• <br />Bluffing at the outcrop could occur but geologic conditions of the <br />coal will not allow mining close to the outcrop, therefore sluffing is <br />unlikely. <br />Transportation <br />There is no coal truck traffic increase expected as a result of this <br />operation. At 4 million cons per year production, seven co eight trains <br />per week would haul coal and at maximum production of 5.0 million cons per <br />year, nine to ten trains per week would haul coal out of the valley from <br />the West Elk Mine. Ac maximum production for all mines in the North Fork, <br />train traffic would increase to 14 trains per week. This is an increase of <br />three trains per week from the number of trains per week hauling coal in <br />1993. <br />County wide traffic associated with coal related growth would not be <br />expected to significantly overload any county or Stale road system. While <br />traffic accidents would be expected [o increase an unspecified amount, the <br />accident rate (accident per vehicle mile) itself would not be expected to <br />increase. <br />Wildlife and Endangered Species <br />Surface disturbances and activity associated with development and • <br />operation of above ground coal mining facilities would affect wildlife to <br />the extent they would destroy habitat, disrupt behavioral activities, <br />causing increased competition on adjacent areas, cause direct mortality, or <br />decreased natality. <br />Existing stands of Grand Mesa penscemon, a candidate species, would be <br />disturbed with initial disturbances. In the long term though, they could <br />be increased since this species appears to be disturbance dependant. <br />However, plant survey would be required prior to any surface disturbance to <br />determine their presence. , <br />Breeding and nesting habitat of the loggerhead shrike and other <br />neotropical birds would be diminished by disturbances in sagebrush, Gambel <br />oak, and riparian vegetation stands. Disturbances in the sagebrush and oak <br />stands should be avoided to the extent possible. No disturbances should <br />occur within the designated riparian areas. <br />Bald eagle nest sites, winter coos[ sites, and winter concentration <br />areas, and Golden eagle nest sites which may be established during the life <br />of this project would he aEfecced to the degree disturbances would occur. <br />Through consultation with the Service and Golorado Division of Wildlife <br />protective measures have been developed to protect these sites. <br />Water depletion associated with coal mining on this tract would impact <br />populations of Colorado squawfish, Razorback sucker, Humpback chub, and - <br />Bonycail chub and their critical habitats found downs cream in the Gunnison <br />and Colorado Rivers. Even [hough there is no anticipated water use or '`- <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.