Laserfiche WebLink
sources of water (US FS water resources, stock: ponds and intermittent <br />• springs) shown oh the :lest Elk :fine and Reclamation Plan, Map 37. See <br />Table 1 for the adjudicated stater rights. <br />TABLE 1. ADJUDICATED WATER RIGHTS <br />LAND <br />NAME OF STRUCTURE STATUS SUBDIVISION SEC TWN RNG <br />Hawks Nest Pipeline No. 2 Fee NWSESE 10 13S 90W <br />Hawks Nest Water Supply Fee NWSESE 10 135 90W <br />Hawks Nest Pipeline No.3 BIM NWNESE 11 13S 90W <br />Tony Bear Pipeline - Yuma SPG Fee SESWSW 15 13S 90W <br />Tony Bear Pipeline - Wampum SPG FS SESW~IW 22 13S 90W <br />Tony Bear Pipeline - Hogan S?G FS SWSWNW 22 13S 90W <br />Tony Bear Pipeline - ::ig-:am S?C FS NWNWSW 22 135 90W <br />• Ground Water <br />The pocenc'_ai .or ground cater occurrence, on the lease tract, exists <br />in both the ::esaverde ?ormacion and unconsolidated quaternary surface <br />• deposits of col~uvium/alluvia=. :lithin the Mesaverde Formation both the <br />Rollins Sandstore and -various c:~'_ - --ers, depending on secondary <br />porosity, can transmit ground ware:. Hc•=•ter, with the geologic dip of the <br />Mesaverde Formation being roughly 3.5 degrees to the north-northeast, <br />ground water rechar5e could ~e limited to the southern flanks of West <br />Flatiron or from the 2-3 possible faults crossing the lease tract; <br />The springs are most lively associated with surface Quaternary <br />deposits and/or local fault systems. <br />There are no municipal •:atersheds or National Resources Waters located <br />on the proposed lease tract. <br />Socioeconomic <br />The proposed lease tract is located in Gunnison County and most of the <br />workers live in Delta County and [he mine buys locally as much as <br />possible. These local a::~enditures by the mine affect mainly Delta <br />County. Delta County, thus, is the focus of the economic impact area <br />analysis. <br />Between <br />population. <br />23,466. The <br />percent over <br />[owns ~^ Del <br />• <br />1980 and <br />The 1980 <br />1990 ten <br />the 1980 <br />.a County <br />!99~~, ~e'_ta County experienced changes in its <br />population was 21,225 and the 1985 population was <br />sus puts the population at 20,980, a decrease of one <br />population count. See Table 2 for the population of <br />T.F "~lorsc'.c Uivisior. ~= Lcccl Government has made <br />