Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />C.~ ~ <br />UO~ <br />URS Operating Servicl:s, Inc. j <br />- i <br />I <br />IV. FOR,~I 1 - SAbIPLF- At~'ALYSIS RESULTS ' <br />I <br />Sample analyses wire entered correctly on Form Is. <br />Yes \ No <br />Comments: None. <br />Data Validation Report <br />V. FORS[ 2A - lVIT1AL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION <br />The initial and continuing calibration verification standards (ICV and CC V, respectively) met <br />nuahod requirements. <br />Yes ~ No <br />- - f <br />Continents: The calibration correlation coefficients for mercury ahd cyanide were greater than <br />0.99 ~ . <br />r <br />The calibration verification results here within 90- 110%recovery for metals, 3~- I I ~% forcyanide, <br />and 80- I?0% for mercur}•. <br />Yes X No_ + <br />Ceaunents: None. <br />i <br />The continuinc calibration standards o-ere run at 10% frequency. ! <br />Yes X No_ I <br />i <br />Comments: None. i <br />VI. FORi\i ZB - CRDL STANDARD FOR ICP AND AA ~ <br />ICP Analysis: Standards (CRI) at nvo times thz CRDL or the IDL (wihichever were greater) were <br />analyzed at the beginning and the end ofeach sample run, or at a minuntun of hvice per tight hours, <br />i <br />whichever was more f-requen[. ~ <br />Ye; X No_ I <br />Comments: Alone, <br />LGI'_2?m ~ Illor1a111C - G <br />