My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL39029
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL39029
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:58:35 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 9:58:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981011
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
1/24/2003
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance for SL2
From
Partial Phase I & Full Phases II & III
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
independently analyzed vazious hydrologic impacts. The Division then compared Sunland's <br />conclusions and the results of the Division's independent analyses to the requirements of Sunland's <br />approved reclamation plan and to the regulatory requirements for bond release. <br />Chronol~ of Division's Review of Bond Release ApAlication <br />The Division notified Sunland's consultant, by phone, on November 4, 2002 that the pond's <br />emergency spillway would need to be reconstructed before the bond release application could be <br />found adequate. The consultant responded on November 27, 2002 with revised pages for Technical <br />Revision 13 showing the spillway design. The Division notified the consultant by phone on January <br />3, 2003 of changes to text needed on page 6 of the vegetation study portion of the bond release <br />submittal. The Division received an adequate response on January 13, 2003. The Division notified <br />the consultant by phone on January 13, 2002 that the bond release acreages specified in the bond <br />release application differed from the acreage values in the Division's database. The Division <br />received an adequate response on January 15, 2002. The Division notified the consultant by fax on <br />January 14, 2002 of changes needed to text in the bond release application and the need to submit <br />proofs of notice. The Division received adequate responses on January 15, 2003. <br />The Division conducted an analysis of Sunland's hydrologic impacts. The analysis covered data in <br />the bond release application and past annual hydrology reports. <br />Comments and Obiections <br />The Division received no comments, written objections, or requests for an informal conference <br />regazding the bond release application. <br />III. CRITERIA FOR BOND RELEASE <br />Phase I Bond Release <br />Section 3.03.1(2)(a) states, "Up to sixty percent of the applicable bond amoiunt shall be released <br />when the pemuttee successfully completes backfilling, regrading, and drainage control in accordance <br />with the approved reclamation plan." The approximate 1800-square foot drainage control berm is <br />the only part of the current bond release that is being considered for Phase I release. (The rest of the <br />mine either received Phase I release in 1996, or has been approved as permanent.) The approved <br />reclamation plan for the drainage control berm required it to be graded down to the level of the <br />adjacent yazd azea, and the graded material was to be placed on the access road that extends from the <br />county road to the building. <br />Phase II Bond Release <br />A Phase II bond release is allowed by those parts of Section 3.03.1(2)(b) which say, "Up to <br />eighty-five percent of the applicable bond amount shall be released upon the establishment <br />of vegetation which supports the approved postmining land use..." and "....which meets the <br />Apex No. 2 Mine Page 5 January 24, 2003 <br />Phases I, II, and III Bond Release <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.